Value of FDG-PET for Lung Cancer Varies By Region
Using FDG-PET imaging to diagnose cancer may not be effective in certain areas of the country, where certain lung infections may be endemic.
Use of FDG-PET technology to diagnose lung cancer may not be accurate in certain areas of the United States, according to a study published in JAMA.
Researchers from Vanderbilt University in Tennessee and the Tennessee Valley Healthcare System-Veterans Affairs undertook a study to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET for pulmonary nodules suspicious for lung cancer in areas where infections like histoplasmosis or tuberculosis are common, compared with areas where these infections were not frequently found.
The researchers searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Web of Science for lung cancer abstracts published from October 1, 2000 to April 28, 2014. Studies had to include 10 or more subjects to be considered. The researchers included articles reporting information that was sufficient to calculate sensitivity and specificity of the FDG-PET to diagnose lung cancer. Of 1,923 articles found, 70 articles that reported on 8,511 nodules were included in the study. A total of 5,105 (60%) were malignant.
The results showed heterogeneity for sensitivity (87%) and specificity (82%) was observed across the studies. The pooled (unadjusted) sensitivity was 89% and specificity was 75%. “There was a 16 percent lower average adjusted specificity in regions with endemic infectious lung disease (61 percent) compared with nonendemic regions (77 percent),” wrote the authors.
[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"27949","attributes":{"alt":"","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_7584201088175","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"2789","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"margin: 1px; border-style: solid; line-height: 1.538em; height: 249px; width: 166px; float: right;","title":"Stephen Deppen, PhD, first author","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
"The accuracy of FDG-PET for diagnosing lung nodules varied widely from study to study," first author Stephen Deppen, PhD, assistant professor in thoracic surgery, Vanderbilt University, said in a release. "FDG-PET scans had more false positive results and, therefore were less specific in diagnosing lung cancer in regions of the world where infectious lung disease is common in the general population." The authors noted that incorrect findings could lead to unnecessary testing, even lung surgeries.
They concluded that the data do not support the use of FDG-PET for diagnosing lung cancer in endemic regions unless an institution has substantial and proven expertise in FDG-PET interpretation.
Can Photon-Counting CT be an Alternative to MRI for Assessing Liver Fat Fraction?
March 21st 2025Photon-counting CT fat fraction evaluation offered a maximum sensitivity of 81 percent for detecting steatosis and had a 91 percent ICC agreement with MRI proton density fat fraction assessment, according to new prospective research.
The Reading Room: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer Screenings, and COVID-19
November 3rd 2020In this podcast episode, Dr. Shalom Kalnicki, from Montefiore and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, discusses the disparities minority patients face with cancer screenings and what can be done to increase access during the pandemic.
New Analysis Forecasts Substantial Cost Savings with the Use of Photon Counting CT for CCTA
March 8th 2025The use of ultra-high-resolution photon-counting CT in the evaluation of stable chest pain may significantly reduce follow-up tests and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) procedures, possibly resulting in millions in health-care cost savings, according to a cost-effectiveness analysis presented recently at the European Congress of Radiology.
