Connecting with radiologists for virtual consults yields varying opinions from referrers, radiologists.
Physicians find virtual consults (VCs) with radiologists useful in many cases, but radiologists may find them disruptive to their workflow, according to a study published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.
Researchers from Langone Medical Center in New York City, NY, performed a study to determine how physicians felt about a VC system that would allow them to consult with radiologists remotely.
The referrers directly accessed the VC through electronic medical records (EMRs) and used instant messaging to contact the appropriate subspecialist radiologist. The radiologist then accessed the VC through PACS. Along with the ability to communicate via the messaging service, both the referrer and the radiologist could view the radiologist’s PACS display through screen sharing. The radiologists’ and referrers’ feedback was evaluated after the institution’s first 110 VC sessions.
The results showed that this service was used most often by emergency physicians (27.3%) and those in internal medicine (13.6%). The radiologists’ most common subspecialties were abdominal (33.6%) and thoracic (16.4%) imaging. On average, the screen-shares lasted about 12 minutes.
The majority of referrers (80% to 90%) reported that the VC was easy to use. They also said that having access to VC was helpful in situations where location and time constraints made traditional consultation difficult, or if they needed a quick response for a targeted question. The referrers said that VC:[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"48000","attributes":{"alt":"","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_3856503757490","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"5707","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"height: 170px; width: 170px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 1px; float: right;","title":"©america365/Shutterstock.com","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
• Was easy to use
• Improved their understanding of the radiology report
• Affected patient management
• Enhanced the radiologist’s role
However, although the referrers liked the VCs and the radiologists recognized referrers’ positive response to the system, the radiologists tended to view the VC as disruptive to their normal workflow.
Where Things Stand with the Radiologist Shortage
June 18th 2025A new report conveys the cumulative impact of ongoing challenges with radiologist residency positions, reimbursement, post-COVID-19 attrition rates and the aging of the population upon the persistent shortage of radiologists in the United States.
How to Successfully Launch a CCTA Program at Your Hospital or Practice
June 11th 2025Emphasizing increasing recognition of the capability of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for the evaluation of acute and stable chest pain, this author defuses common misperceptions and reviews key considerations for implementation of a CCTA program.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Mammography AI Platform for Five-Year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Gets FDA De Novo Authorization
June 2nd 2025Through AI recognition of subtle patterns in breast tissue on screening mammograms, the Clairity Breast software reportedly provides validated risk scoring for predicting one’s five-year risk of breast cancer.