• AI
  • Molecular Imaging
  • CT
  • X-Ray
  • Ultrasound
  • MRI
  • Facility Management
  • Mammography

Reality targets ultrasound OEMs

Article

Ultrasound manufacturers are adept at image acquisition and displaytechnology, but these skills may not be pertinent to the developmentof three-dimensional and other image processing techniques. Vendorsmight be well-advised to outsource this technology

Ultrasound manufacturers are adept at image acquisition and displaytechnology, but these skills may not be pertinent to the developmentof three-dimensional and other image processing techniques. Vendorsmight be well-advised to outsource this technology rather thaninvest in internal development, according to Robert H. Wake, presidentof Reality Imaging.

Reality, a supplier of 3-D ultrasound technology, is targetingOEMS in this emerging field. The Solon, OH, firm was the onlyindependent 3-D company displaying its wares at the February meetingof the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine in Atlanta.Although Reality has a number of OEM agreements with multimodalityvendors, it is still seeking its first dedicated ultrasound customer,Wake told SCAN.

The firm's largest OEM customer is Toshiba, which uses a freestanding3-D workstation for its magnetic resonance imaging line. OtherOEMs incorporate Reality's Voxel Flinger 3-D processing engineinto their equipment. Over half the company's sales are to scannervendors, he said.

There is no 3-D ultrasound system commercially available inthe U.S. market. Both Acoustic Imaging and Philips (see followingstory) have shown 3-D images, but are at least a year from commercializinga product. Kretztechnik of Austria has built a 3-D ultrasoundunit that is awaiting FDA market approval.

Development of 3-D ultrasound has lagged behind other imagingmodalities for technological and economic reasons, Wake said.

"The technical problems are easier with CT. Ultrasoundcan be intimidating. It produces a tremendous volume of data ina short time," he said.

Several years ago, 3-D workstations cost more than an entirehigh-end radiological ultrasound scanner. That pricing relationshiphas changed dramatically. Color-flow Doppler and other improvementsto scanner technology have increased the cost--and capabilities--ofhigh-end scanners, while workstation and 3-D technology has becomeless expensive, he said.

"They are moving in opposite directions. Three-D technologyis becoming more affordable," Wake noted.

Recent Videos
Radiology Study Finds Increasing Rates of Non-Physician Practitioner Image Interpretation in Office Settings
Addressing the Early Impact of National Breast Density Notification for Mammography Reports
Where the USPSTF Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations Fall Short: An Interview with Stacy Smith-Foley, MD
A Closer Look at MRI-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
Making the Case for Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Vascular Interventions
Nina Kottler, MD, MS
Radiology Challenges with Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Breast Implants
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.