Researchers determine quantitative ultrasound could be superior to conventional ultrasound for predicting fat acculturation in the liver.
Quantitative ultrasound could be more effective in predicting the grade of fat accumulation in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) than conventional ultrasound. In a study conducted at the University of California at San Diego, published in the American Journal of Roentgenology, researchers explored whether investigational quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters were more effective than conventional ultrasound (CUS) and MRI-estimated proton density fat fraction (PDFF) for predicting fat accumulation in the liver (hepatic steatosis) in non-alcoholic adults. For the study, 61 adults with confirmed NAFLD underwent QUS, CUS, and MRI examinations within 100 days of liver biopsy. Based on analysis, CUS had 51.7 percent grading accuracy. Raw and cross-validated steatosis grading accuracies were 61.7 percent and 55.0 percent, respectively, for attenuated co-efficient, 68.3 percent and 68.3 percent for backscatter co-efficient. For MRI-estimated PDFF, it was 76.7 percent and 71.3 percent. Interobserver agreements were 53.3 percent for CUS, 90 percent for attenuation coefficient, and 71.7 percent for backscatter coefficient.
New AI-Enabled Portable Ultrasound May Facilitate 50 Percent Reduction in Cardiac Imaging Scan Time
March 28th 2025Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered measurement capabilities provide key features with the Compact Ultrasound 5500CV device, which was unveiled at the American College of Cardiology (ACC) conference.
The Reading Room: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer Screenings, and COVID-19
November 3rd 2020In this podcast episode, Dr. Shalom Kalnicki, from Montefiore and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, discusses the disparities minority patients face with cancer screenings and what can be done to increase access during the pandemic.
Can Ultrasound-Based Radiomics Enhance Differentiation of HER2 Breast Cancer?
March 11th 2025Multicenter research revealed that a combined model of clinical factors and ultrasound-based radiomics exhibited greater than a 23 percent higher per patient-level accuracy rate for identifying HER2 breast cancer than a clinical model.