The recently inaugurated American College of Radiology Imaging Network randomized trial comparing virtual colonoscopy with its traditional counterpart has cooled the debate about which technique is better. Participants at the annual American Roentgen Ray Society meeting in May seemed to reserve judgment pending results from the National CT Colonography Trial.
The recently inaugurated American College of Radiology Imaging Network randomized trial comparing virtual colonoscopy with its traditional counterpart has cooled the debate about which technique is better. Participants at the annual American Roentgen Ray Society meeting in May seemed to reserve judgment pending results from the National CT Colonography Trial.
The research continues, however, into making virtual colonoscopy quicker, easier, and more accurate. Two studies presented at the meeting reported the effects of a prepless protocol. The researchers found that eliminating the irksome preparation might improve patient compliance, but it also interferes with radiologists' accuracy and proved troublesome for computer-aided detection.
Dr. Abraham Dachman, a professor of clinical radiology at the University of Chicago, and his colleagues in the U.S. and Belgium compared 12 patients who had a prepless protocol with 14 who underwent a mild prep. Stool tagging was used for both groups. Studies from the prepless group were more difficult to interpret, requiring 2D reads in both lung and bone windows. Residual stool often made the 3D reads impossible.
The prepless group didn't score much better on comfort: They gave the experience a rating of 1.2, compared with 1.8 for the mild prep group, on a 10-point comfort scale in which 1 was best and 10 was worst.
Prepless patients also had three times as many segments with stool than the other group as well as a larger percentage of mucosal surface covered by stool. This statistic is important, Dachman said, because it may indicate the number of polyps hidden in the stool.
"No one has done this type of data analysis before," he said.
In a second study from the same institution, 24 of the original 26 patients were again separated into a prepless and a mild prep group. Researchers found that CAD systems that had been trained on cleansed colons faltered when patients had not undergone cathartic cleansing.
Dr. Hiroyuki Yoshida, an associate professor of radiology at the University of Chicago, and colleagues trained an in-house CAD system using 121 independently collected CT colonography cases in which all colons had been rigorously cleansed but no tagging was used.
During the training, the CAD system posted 90% sensitivity with a 1.2 false-positive rate per data set. When investigators used the CAD system for the same patient cohort as the Dachman study, the results differed considerably.
While CAD detected all polyps in both groups, it reported an average of 5.8 false positives for the prepless group. The rate dropped to an average of 2.8 false positives for the prepped cohort.
In the prepless patients, 75% of the false positives were caused by untagged stool and 12% by partially tagged stool. In the prepped group, untagged stool accounted for 21% of the false positives and folds in the colon for 36% of false positives.
The researchers concluded that some cleansing is still required to enhance interpretation and polyp detection.
Study with CT Data Suggests Women with PE Have More Than Triple the One-Year Mortality Rate than Men
April 3rd 2025After a multivariable assessment including age and comorbidities, women with pulmonary embolism (PE) had a 48 percent higher risk of one-year mortality than men with PE, according to a new study involving over 33,000 patients.
The Reading Room: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer Screenings, and COVID-19
November 3rd 2020In this podcast episode, Dr. Shalom Kalnicki, from Montefiore and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, discusses the disparities minority patients face with cancer screenings and what can be done to increase access during the pandemic.
Predicting Diabetes on CT Scans: What New Research Reveals with Pancreatic Imaging Biomarkers
March 25th 2025Attenuation-based biomarkers on computed tomography (CT) scans demonstrated a 93 percent interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) agreement across three pancreatic segmentation algorithms for predicting diabetes, according to a study involving over 9,700 patients.
Can Photon-Counting CT be an Alternative to MRI for Assessing Liver Fat Fraction?
March 21st 2025Photon-counting CT fat fraction evaluation offered a maximum sensitivity of 81 percent for detecting steatosis and had a 91 percent ICC agreement with MRI proton density fat fraction assessment, according to new prospective research.