Parents may be underestimate the small increased cancer risk associated with their child undergoing a CT scan.
Parents may be underestimating the small increased cancer risk associated with their child undergoing a computed tomography (CT) scan. The results of a study published this month in Pediatrics indicated that less than half of parents were aware of this risk.
“Anecdotally, parents often ask about radiation exposure from plain X-rays, but rarely when a CT is ordered,” Kathy Boutis, MD, of the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, told Diagnostic Imaging. “To the investigators, this was a little surprising since CT exposes patients to 60- to 80-fold greater radiation.”
In this study, Boutis and colleagues wanted to explore parents’ knowledge on the topic to offer more reassurance about plain X-rays. In addition, if a knowledge deficit about radiation was found, physicians would likely be more accountable to initiating informed discussions to parents about the risks and benefits of CT imaging, Boutis said.
The researchers surveyed 742 parents whose children presented with a head injury. Of the participants, only 46.8 percent had knowledge of the fact that radiation exposure during a CT increased the lifetime risk from malignancy.
In addition, the surveyed parents tended to underestimate the radiation dose and risk associated with a CT, and overestimated the exposure dose during X-rays. More than half of the parents underestimated radiation exposure from a head CT compared with background radiation exposure. In contrast, 44.8 percent of surveyed parents overestimated the potential risk for malignancy associated with a skull radiograph.
Before parents were informed about the risk estimation from CT, 90.4 percent were very willing or willing to proceed with a head CT. However, after the information was disclosed, 69.6 percent were very willing or willing, and 5.6 percent would have refused CT.
“About 90 percent of parents would like more information about radiation exposure from diagnostic tests like CT scans,” Boutis said, adding that this is something that the medical community as a whole should be aware of and move to address.
Physicians should be aware that parents are increasingly concerned and aware of the potential risks associated with tests such as CT.
“We as physicians need to be willing and, indeed, initiate discussions about this, and carefully balance the benefit expected from a scan against the potential small risk,” Boutis said. “It will likely always be difficult to define exactly what the risk is associated with CT, but we should take a best practice approach and consider that there may be a small future risk.”
Boutis recommended that physicians perform a risk/benefit analysis to ensure that CT is only used when it is most beneficial to patients. In addition, she said that it is important for physicians to be able to discuss the relative doses of different imaging tests.
Study with CT Data Suggests Women with PE Have More Than Triple the One-Year Mortality Rate than Men
April 3rd 2025After a multivariable assessment including age and comorbidities, women with pulmonary embolism (PE) had a 48 percent higher risk of one-year mortality than men with PE, according to a new study involving over 33,000 patients.
The Reading Room: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer Screenings, and COVID-19
November 3rd 2020In this podcast episode, Dr. Shalom Kalnicki, from Montefiore and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, discusses the disparities minority patients face with cancer screenings and what can be done to increase access during the pandemic.
Predicting Diabetes on CT Scans: What New Research Reveals with Pancreatic Imaging Biomarkers
March 25th 2025Attenuation-based biomarkers on computed tomography (CT) scans demonstrated a 93 percent interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) agreement across three pancreatic segmentation algorithms for predicting diabetes, according to a study involving over 9,700 patients.
Can Photon-Counting CT be an Alternative to MRI for Assessing Liver Fat Fraction?
March 21st 2025Photon-counting CT fat fraction evaluation offered a maximum sensitivity of 81 percent for detecting steatosis and had a 91 percent ICC agreement with MRI proton density fat fraction assessment, according to new prospective research.