Patients undergoing medical imaging with radiation want their physicians to discuss the benefits and risks with them.
There is a substantial gap between patient expectations and current practices for providing information about radiological medical imaging tests, according to a study published in the journal Radiology.
Researchers from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, NY, sought to identify areas where patient-centered communication regarding radiological diagnostic imaging tests could be improved.
The researchers reviewed nine hours of transcribed conversations with 30 people who had undergone medical imaging exams. The goal was to determine the participants’ understanding of the benefits and risks associated with various medical imaging procedures, as well as their expectations regarding communication of those benefits and risks.
The participants included:
• Patients undergoing treatment for metastatic colorectal carcinoma
• Women treated within the previous six months for early-stage breast carcinoma
• Men undergoing surveillance after testicular cancer treatment
• Parents of patients treated for stage I–III neuroblastoma
• Patients in a thoracic oncology survivorship program
• Participants in a lung cancer screening program
While most participants did understand the benefits and needs related to imaging, as demonstrated by comments such as “That CT saved my daughter’s life,” and “I’d rather have the radiation dosage than being opened up,” they reported that most of their information was obtained by self-directed Internet research, not through discussions with their physician. This was expressed in comments, such as “If you don’t ask, nobody is going to tell you anything.”[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"33950","attributes":{"alt":"Raymond H. Thornton, MD","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_8575342101710","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"3597","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"float: right; height: 107px; width: 160px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 1px;","title":"Raymond H. Thornton, MD","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
“Interest in having more information and participating in decision making about medical imaging clearly increased as patients transitioned from active cancer treatment to survivorship,” lead author Raymond H. Thornton, MD, interventional radiologist at MSKCC, said in a release. “Cancer survivors typically focus on healthful living and risk-factor reduction, so they were particularly eager to participate in discussions about potential long-term risks of radiation.”
The participants also expressed a desire to be told information such as:
• The rationale for ordering specific imaging examinations
• Intervals for follow-up imaging
• Testing alternatives
“This may not be what we in the medical field want to hear, but I think it’s important that we hear it,” senior author Jennifer Hay, PhD, said in the same release. “Patients want this information, and they prefer to receive it from doctors they know and trust.”
New Collaboration Offers Promise of Automating Prior Authorizations in Radiology with AI
March 26th 2025In addition to a variety of tools to promote radiology workflow efficiencies, the integration of the Gravity AI tools into the PowerServer RIS platform may reduce time-consuming prior authorizations to minutes for completion.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Study Explores Impact of Insurance on Treatment and Referrals for Patients with Uterine Fibroids
February 19th 2025Women with uterine fibroids and Medicaid coverage are significantly more likely to be treated with uterine artery embolization than those with commercial insurance, according to newly published research.