CTA Superior to SPECT-MPI in Detecting CAD
Non-invasive CTA is more accurate in detecting coronary artery disease among symptomatic patients than SPECT-MPI.
Coronary CT angiography (CTA) is more accurate than single-photon emission CT-acquired myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) in diagnosing coronary artery disease, according to a study published in Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging.
Researchers from the US, Japan, and Brazil, sought to compare the accuracy of SPCET-MPI and CTA in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD).
A total of 391 symptomatic patients from 16 hospitals in eight countries were prospectively enrolled in the study after they had been referred for a cardiac catheterization. All underwent CT angiograms, followed by catheter-based coronary angiographies. Within two months of initial testing, all underwent exercise stress tests.[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"43459","attributes":{"alt":"","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_5342151013827","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"4737","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"float: right;","title":"Armin Zadeh, MD, PhD","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
“The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CTA and SPECT-MPI for identifying patients with CAD defined as the presence of one or more coronary artery with 50 percent or more lumen stenosis by quantitative coronary angiography,” the authors wrote.
The results showed that CTA was better than SPECT-MPI in identifying CAD. CT angiograms accurately detected or ruled out artery blockages in 91% of patients, compared with 69% for stress testing.
Among a subgroup of 111 patients with very high-risk disease, the diagnostic accuracy of CT angiograms was 96%, compared with 80% for stress testing.
The results were similar for patients who had no history of CAD, as well as those with secondary end points of 70% or more stenosis and multivessel disease. The only patients in the study who did not do better with CTA were those who had a calcium score of 400 or higher, and those with a high-risk anatomy.
"No tests is 100 percent accurate 100 percent of the time, but our findings indicate CT angiograms get pretty close to that coveted threshold," lead investigator Armin Zadeh, MD, PhD, associate professor of medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, MD, said in a release.
What is the Best Use of AI in CT Lung Cancer Screening?
April 18th 2025In comparison to radiologist assessment, the use of AI to pre-screen patients with low-dose CT lung cancer screening provided a 12 percent reduction in mean interpretation time with a slight increase in specificity and a slight decrease in the recall rate, according to new research.
The Reading Room: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer Screenings, and COVID-19
November 3rd 2020In this podcast episode, Dr. Shalom Kalnicki, from Montefiore and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, discusses the disparities minority patients face with cancer screenings and what can be done to increase access during the pandemic.
Can CT-Based AI Radiomics Enhance Prediction of Recurrence-Free Survival for Non-Metastatic ccRCC?
April 14th 2025In comparison to a model based on clinicopathological risk factors, a CT radiomics-based machine learning model offered greater than a 10 percent higher AUC for predicting five-year recurrence-free survival in patients with non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).
Could Lymph Node Distribution Patterns on CT Improve Staging for Colon Cancer?
April 11th 2025For patients with microsatellite instability-high colon cancer, distribution-based clinical lymph node staging (dCN) with computed tomography (CT) offered nearly double the accuracy rate of clinical lymph node staging in a recent study.
