New research conducted at the University of Erasmus in Rotterdam may erase any lingering doubts about the superiority of 64-slice CT in detecting coronary artery disease.
New research conducted at the University of Erasmus in Rotterdam may erase any lingering doubts about the superiority of 64-slice CT in detecting coronary artery disease.
Dr. Francesca Pugliese, a radiology researcher at the university, studied 153 symptomatic patients and found that 64-slice CT is faster, more comprehensive, and more accurate than 16-slice; ultrafast, second-generation 16-slice; and four-slice CT for evaluating the coronary arteries for diagnosing stenoses. The research was presented Sunday at the RSNA meeting.
Three sets of 51 patients each were scanned on each device. Significant disease was defined as 50% or greater stenoses. Two radiologists read the CT studies, and a cardiologist provided lesion classification from follow-up coronary angiography.
Considering coronary branches measuring >2 mm in diameter, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values for 16-slice CT were 92%, 93%, 64%, and 99%, respectively. For ultrafast 16-slice CT of the same region, researchers found sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV to be 95%, 98%, 87%, and 99%, respectively. For 64-slice CT, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 92%, 93%, 69%, and 99%, respectively.
Vessel wall calcification was less extensive in the ultrafast 16-slice group. In the 64-slice CT group, including the assessable
Previously reported problems with visualization of small, distal segments for 16-slice, eight-slice, and four-slice CT appear to be largely solved by moving up to 64-slice scanning. Only 2% of the segments were judged to be of low diagnostic confidence with the 64-slice device. In comparison, poorly imaged segments accounted for 26% of the total for the four-slice CT population. Seven percent of the segments were scored with low user confidence, although all segments assessed with conventional angiography were deemed accessible.
The average scanning time on the 64-slice device was 313 seconds. That time is 64 seconds faster than a second-generation 16-slice CT device capable of half-second rotations, 117 seconds faster than a first-generation 16-slice CT performing one-second rotations, and 187 seconds faster than a four-slice CT scanner.
"We can conclude that 64-slice CT might broaden the application of multidetector CT coronary angiography in terms of the anatomical information it can protect and its clinical implementation," Pugliese said.
Study with CT Data Suggests Women with PE Have More Than Triple the One-Year Mortality Rate than Men
April 3rd 2025After a multivariable assessment including age and comorbidities, women with pulmonary embolism (PE) had a 48 percent higher risk of one-year mortality than men with PE, according to a new study involving over 33,000 patients.
The Reading Room: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer Screenings, and COVID-19
November 3rd 2020In this podcast episode, Dr. Shalom Kalnicki, from Montefiore and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, discusses the disparities minority patients face with cancer screenings and what can be done to increase access during the pandemic.
Predicting Diabetes on CT Scans: What New Research Reveals with Pancreatic Imaging Biomarkers
March 25th 2025Attenuation-based biomarkers on computed tomography (CT) scans demonstrated a 93 percent interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) agreement across three pancreatic segmentation algorithms for predicting diabetes, according to a study involving over 9,700 patients.
Can Photon-Counting CT be an Alternative to MRI for Assessing Liver Fat Fraction?
March 21st 2025Photon-counting CT fat fraction evaluation offered a maximum sensitivity of 81 percent for detecting steatosis and had a 91 percent ICC agreement with MRI proton density fat fraction assessment, according to new prospective research.