Contrast-enhanced PET/CT appears to be better than non-CE PET/CT in assessing distant metastasis in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Contrast-enhanced (CE) PET/CT provides a more precise assessment of distant metastasis, scalene node metastasis, and peritoneal dissemination in patients with pancreatic cancer, according to a study published in the European Journal of Radiology.
Researchers from Japan sought to clarify the diagnostic impact of CE 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)–PET/CT for staging of pancreatic cancer compared to non-CE PET/CT.
Ninety-five patients (age range: 36 to 83) diagnosed with primary pancreatic cancer participated in the study, which took place between April 2006 and November 2009. Two blinded reviewers analyzed the images, and the researchers compared diagnostic accuracy between the non-CE PET/CT and CE PET/CT images.
The results showed that, for T-staging, both modalities correctly diagnosed invasion of the duodenum (20 cases, 21%), mesentery (12 cases, 13%), and retroperitoneum (13 cases, 14%).
“The ROC analyses revealed that the Az values of celiac artery (CA), common hepatic artery (CHA), splenic artery (SV), and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) invasion were significantly higher in the CE PET/CT group for both readers,” wrote the authors.
Contrast-enhanced PET/CT correctly diagnosed nodal metastasis in 38 patients (88%); non-CE PET/CT correctly diagnosed the same metastasis in 45 patients (87%). Diagnostic accuracies of nodal metastasis in two modalities were similar.
Distant metastasis, scalene node metastasis, and peritoneal dissemination were correctly assigned in 39 patients (91%) using CE PET/CT, while the same was found in 42 patients (81%) with non-CE PET/CT. “Diagnostic accuracy of distant metastasis, scalene node metastasis, and peritoneal dissemination with CE PET/CT was significantly higher than that of non-CE PET/CT,” the authors noted.
The authors concluded that using contrast-enhanced PET/CT provided a more precise look at distant metastasis, scalene node metastasis, and peritoneal dissemination in patients with pancreatic cancer.
New Study Examines Agreement Between Radiologists and Referring Clinicians on Follow-Up Imaging
November 18th 2024Agreement on follow-up imaging was 41 percent more likely with recommendations by thoracic radiologists and 36 percent less likely on recommendations for follow-up nuclear imaging, according to new research.
The Reading Room: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer Screenings, and COVID-19
November 3rd 2020In this podcast episode, Dr. Shalom Kalnicki, from Montefiore and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, discusses the disparities minority patients face with cancer screenings and what can be done to increase access during the pandemic.