Q&A: Implementing technology in stages
January 3rd 2008Editor’s note: Over the past year, Ron Schilling’s commentaries in DI SCAN have addressed issues regarding business strategies in medical imaging. We are publishing some of the questions and responses rising from those commentaries, while inviting new requests for information.
Q&A: Consultant, manager -- or both?
October 25th 2007Editor’s note: Over the past year, Ron Schilling’s commentaries in DI SCAN have addressed issues regarding business strategies in medical imaging. We are publishing some of the questions and responses rising from those commentaries, while inviting new requests for information.
Q&A: Staying focused when developing strategy
October 2nd 2007Editor’s note: Over the past year, Ronald Schilling’s commentaries in DI SCAN have addressed issues regarding business strategies in medical imaging. We are publishing some of those questions and responses and invite new requests for information.
Q&A: Streamlining the purchasing process
August 13th 2007Editor's note: Over the past year, Ron Schilling has been fielding questions from readers in response to his commentaries on business strategies in medical imaging. We are publishing some of those questions and responses and invite new requests for information.
Q&A: Tower of Babel greets RFP organizers
June 25th 2007Editor’s note: Over the past year, Ron Schilling has been fielding questions from readers in response to his commentaries on business strategies in medical imaging. We are publishing some of those questions and responses and invite new requests for information.
Planning sets framework for evolving medical practice
September 25th 2006In a previous column on technology assessment, it was noted that PACS installations completed during the early years of the technology typically yielded low value. The key reason was that technology adoption was not accompanied by behavior modification. Physicians continued to print film rather than make diagnoses from soft-copy images. Why wasn’t this situation avoided? Why didn’t the manufacturers work with the customers to train and prepare them to use the new technology properly( “Successful technology implementation makes medical imaging tick”)?
Successful technology implementation makes medical imaging tick
August 9th 2006The successful implementation of new technology is what makes the field of medical imaging tick. Making this happen cost-effectively is often difficult to do, because we are dealing not only with the technology in question, but also with the processes associated with implementation. These processes affect behavior and behavior is driven by one’s belief system.
High 5 highlights importance of understanding the competition
April 7th 2006One of the most important factors to determine when evaluating a company, whether a start-up or an established firm, is how well its leaders understand their potential competition. A good example of a bad situation was the lack of understanding that became apparent when the lithotripsy crowd decided to move from kidney stones to gallstones. They viewed the competition as other lithotripsy companies. The real competition turned out to be pharma companies and surgeons. For gallstones can be dissolved with pharma products and the gallbladder simply removed with minimally invasive surgery. They missed the obvious partly because it was not so obvious.