- AI
- Molecular Imaging
- CT
- X-Ray
- Ultrasound
- MRI
- Facility Management
- Mammography
You Get What You Pay For With Health IT
Yes, times are tough. Costs are up, reimbursements are down, yada yada yada. And it’s true, you might not need the flashiest equipment on the market, and the biggest price-tag does not always mean the best product. You might not need the Lamborghini when a Hyundai will get you where you need to go. But paying even less and getting a used junker which will break down once a week is going a little too far with the concept.
“PACS is down again.”
“The prior study is on one of our corrupted tapes.”
“We have a call in to support - I’ll try them again.”
Every time I hear statements like these, my blood pressure nudges upwards and my pulse gets a little quicker. I wouldn’t be surprised if an observer also noticed a little pupillary dilatation, maybe an involuntary muscle-twitch here or there.
It’s not that I expect hardware, software, or even people to do their jobs flawlessly all of the time - no matter how much money was paid for that to be the case.
No, what lambasts my limbics and squeezes my adrenals is the phenomenon of the same breakdowns occurring over and over. And over. The same problems keep cropping up, the same people are informed each time…and yet nothing different happens the next time. And each time, productivity slows to a crawl or comes to a crashing halt because the STAT CT can’t be read. Or the prior study can’t be retrieved.
You would think that all it would take would be one or two such instances to identify the root causes of the dysfunction. Proactive steps could be taken so that the problem would be solved, and that particular error would never recur.
Unfortunately, there is one very common root cause that never seems to get addressed, or if it is, the attention it gets is fleeting at best. It’s an old line: “You get what you pay for.”
Yes, times are tough. Costs are up, reimbursements are down, yada yada yada. And it’s true, you might not need the flashiest equipment on the market, and the biggest price-tag does not always mean the best product. You might not need the Lamborghini when a Hyundai will get you where you need to go. But paying even less and getting a used junker which will break down once a week is going a little too far with the concept.
Keep in mind, also, that saving 10 percent with a cheaper PACS, voice-recognition system, or service-contract might make you feel clever, thrifty, and shrewd…but when that 10 percent savings leads to a 15 percent drop in your productivity for the next decade, you might feel differently.
If nothing else, paying slightly more for a reliable system (or a responsive support staff) might save you money on your hypertension-meds and antacids.
Study Reaffirms Low Risk for csPCa with Biopsy Omission After Negative Prostate MRI
December 19th 2024In a new study involving nearly 600 biopsy-naïve men, researchers found that only 4 percent of those with negative prostate MRI had clinically significant prostate cancer after three years of active monitoring.
Study Examines Impact of Deep Learning on Fast MRI Protocols for Knee Pain
December 17th 2024Ten-minute and five-minute knee MRI exams with compressed sequences facilitated by deep learning offered nearly equivalent sensitivity and specificity as an 18-minute conventional MRI knee exam, according to research presented recently at the RSNA conference.
Can Radiomics Bolster Low-Dose CT Prognostic Assessment for High-Risk Lung Adenocarcinoma?
December 16th 2024A CT-based radiomic model offered over 10 percent higher specificity and positive predictive value for high-risk lung adenocarcinoma in comparison to a radiographic model, according to external validation testing in a recent study.
