Body diffusion is the next frontier for Toshiba MR, according to John Zimmer, vice president of marketing for Toshiba America Medical Systems. The biggest issue is motion-related artifact, he said, but the company is coming up with techniques and software changes to address the problem.
Body diffusion is the next frontier for Toshiba MR, according to John Zimmer, vice president of marketing for Toshiba America Medical Systems. The biggest issue is motion-related artifact, he said, but the company is coming up with techniques and software changes to address the problem.
"The long-term goal is to give PET/CT a run for its money," Zimmer said.
An MR add-on that allows body diffusion imaging will cost about $50,000. A PET/CT scanner can cost millions.
TAMS already has software that supports diffusion-weighted MR of the body, as do Siemens and Philips. The packages are available commercially and clinical work has produced encouraging results. Abdominal studies directed at identifying cancer deliver the best results if the acquisition can be performed in a breath-hold, Zimmer said. After that, motion artifact degrades the image.
The company is focusing in the near term on techniques that increase signal-to-noise and thereby reduce acquisition times. This could reduce or eliminate image distortion due to respiration. The bigger issue, however, is finding clinical test sites to validate MR body diffusion, Zimmer said. PET/CT will serve as the benchmark, he said.
"We will need the imaging community to spend the time to do the cross validation and testing," he said.
Can AI Enhance PET/MRI Assessment for Extraprostatic Tumor Extension in Patients with PCa?
December 17th 2024The use of an adjunctive machine learning model led to 17 and 21 percent improvements in the AUC and sensitivity rate, respectively, for PET/MRI in diagnosing extraprostatic tumor extension in patients with primary prostate cancer.
Can Radiomics Bolster Low-Dose CT Prognostic Assessment for High-Risk Lung Adenocarcinoma?
December 16th 2024A CT-based radiomic model offered over 10 percent higher specificity and positive predictive value for high-risk lung adenocarcinoma in comparison to a radiographic model, according to external validation testing in a recent study.