Patients rate mammogram reports with annotations as easier to comprehend.
Patients have an easier time understanding mammogram reports that include text and picture notes than radiology reports that do not include explanations, according to research presented at SIIM 2020.
As an increasing number of patients now have access to their breast imaging reports via patient portals, investigators from the University of Pennsylvania hypothesized they would be better able to comprehend their test results if the reports also included text and illustrations rather than only definitions or only illustrations.
To test their theory, they surveyed 300 women with an average age of 43.6 about the complexity of mammography reports. First, the participants were asked to rate, on a scale of 1-to-5, how difficult an original unannotated mammogram report was to read. They were, then, asked to do the same thing for three different versions of the report: text-only, pictures-only, and text-and-pictures.
Related Content: Evolution of Radiology Reports: Getting Information To the Patient
According to the results, the women, 70 percent of whom had at least a college degree and 64 percent of whom had undergone at least one mammogram, rated the difficulty level of the original report at 2.9. They rated the text-only and pictures-only versions as 2.1 and 2.6, respectively. The text-and-pictures report received a 2.3 rating.
“Understanding was significantly better for the ‘text only’ reported compared to the ‘pictures only’ version, although there was no difference between the ‘text and picture’ version and either of the other two annotated versions,” the researchers said.
Additionally, when the team isolated responses from women at least 50-years-old – 95 percent of whom had had a mammogram previously – there was still a statistically significant difference in their ease of understanding between the original report and the annotated versions.
For more coverage of SIIM2020, click here.
FDA Clears Updated AI Platform for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
November 12th 2024Employing advanced deep learning convolutional neural networks, ProFound Detection Version 4.0 reportedly offers a 50 percent improvement in detecting cancer in dense breasts in comparison to the previous version of the software.
Is the Kaiser Score More Effective than BI-RADS for Assessing Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and MRI?
October 14th 2024For women with breast-enhanced masses, Kaiser scoring (KS) demonstrated a 20 percent higher AUC than BI-RADS classification for contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and was comparable to KS for breast MRI.
FDA Clears New Features in AI-Powered Mammography Software Suite
October 11th 2024Therapixel’s MammoScreen suite has received 510(k) FDA clearances for a breast density assessment feature and updated software that includes automated pre-reporting, which reportedly expedites reporting of mammography findings.