Targeted biopsies using MRI and ultrasound detect more high-risk prostate cancer.
Targeted MR/ultrasound fusion biopsy is associated with increased detection of high-risk prostate cancer and decreased detection of low-risk prostate cancer, compared with standard extended-sextant US-guided biopsy, according to an article published in JAMA.
Researchers from the National Institutes of Health performed a prospective cohort study to assess targeted biopsy, standard biopsy, and the two combined for the diagnosis of intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer.
A total of 1,003 men, mean age 62.1, undergoing both targeted and standard biopsy participated in the seven-year trial. The patients had been referred after they were found to have elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels or abnormal digital rectal examination results.
The results showed that 461 prostate cancer cases were diagnosed with targeted biopsy compared with 469 cases with standard biopsy. Targeted and standard biopsies produced the same results in 69% of the cases, however 30% more high-risk cancers were diagnosed through targeted biopsy than standard biopsy (173 versus 122 cases) and 17% fewer low-risk cancers (213 versus 258). Adding standard biopsy to targeted biopsy led to a 22 percent increase in cancer diagnoses, the vast majority of them for low-risk cancers.[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"31416","attributes":{"alt":"Mohammad Minhaj Siddiqui, MD","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_4346490155326","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"3311","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 1px; float: right; height: 192px; width: 160px;","title":"Mohammad Minhaj Siddiqui, MD","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
Using targeted biopsy, doctors are able to pinpoint and test suspicious areas because MRIs of the suspected cancer are fused with real-time ultrasound images, creating a map of the prostate. In a standard biopsy, doctors use ultrasound guidance to take multiple random tissue samples from throughout the gland.
Targeted biopsy was also better able to predict whether the disease was low- or intermediate-risk than standard biopsy or the two approaches combined.
"This study demonstrates that targeted fusion-guided biopsy could significantly enhance our ability to identify patients with high-risk prostate cancers that need more aggressive treatment," lead author Mohammad Minhaj Siddiqui, MD, said in a release. Siddiqui was a fellow at NIH when the study was conducted and is now assistant professor of surgery at the University of Maryland School of Medicine and director of urologic robotic surgery at the University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center.
The researchers concluded that the targeted biopsy was better than the standard biopsy in detecting high-risk prostate cancer and lower detection of low-risk prostate cancer.
Meta-Analysis Shows No Difference Between bpMRI and mpMRI in Ruling Out csPCa
March 6th 2025In an 18-study meta-analysis involving over 4,600 patients, researchers found that bpMRI and mpMRI had equivalent pooled negative predictive value (NPV) of 92 percent for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).
Is MRI Contrast Enhancement Necessary for Long-Term Monitoring of Diffuse Glioma?
March 4th 2025In a comparison of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CET1w) MRI (and T2-weighted MRI/FLAIR imaging, researchers found that only three out of 82 cases of glioma progression were solely detected with CET1w MRI.
Emerging AI Software for Prostate MRI Offers 95 Percent Sensitivity for csPCa
February 28th 2025In a multicenter study involving over 1,000 patients, a deep learning software offered comparable sensitivity and specificity for Gleason grade group > 2 tumors in comparison to radiologist interpretation.