To prevent errors and misunderstandings, referring clinicians and radiologists must show more restraint when using abbreviations, a U.K. study has found.
To prevent errors and misunderstandings, referring clinicians and radiologists must show more restraint when using abbreviations, a U.K. study has found.
Around 10,000 medical abbreviations exist, with about 16,000 different meanings, according to Dr. Shilpi Pal, a radiologist at Ninewells Hospital in Dundee and lead author of a scientific poster at RSNA 09. The dangers of abbreviations, however, were shown in a 2008 article in the Journal of the U.K. Medical Defence Union, which found that errors occur due to ambiguities in cases like TOF (tracheoesophageal fistula or tetralogy of Fallot), PID (pelvic inflammatory disease or prolapsed intervertebral disc).
“Many publications highlight the dangers of abbreviations in prescribing errors,” Pal said. “Intervention in reducing abbreviation usage in prescribing has been shown to make a difference. In a litigious society, it is important to ascertain errors due to abbreviations in all aspects of medicine.”
Different clinicians use different abbreviations to refer to the same process, and handwritten request forms may be ambiguous. In radiology, L-spine may be mistaken for C-spine, leading to the wrong exposure to the patient.
Among the most common abbreviations with multiple meanings are CS (cervical spine, Caesarean section, culture and sensitivity), MET (metronidazole, metastasis), AS (aortic stenosis, ankylosing spondylitis), PD (peritoneal dialysis, Parkinson’s disease), and AV (aortic valve, atrioventricular, arteriovenous). Likewise, radiotherapy may be shortened to XRT, RTx, RT, and DXT, while creatinine can be abbreviated to C, Cr, or Creat.
“To prevent harm to the patient, it is vital to ensure that the intended meaning is clear,” Pal said.
The authors analyzed 600 radiology request cards, consisting of 200 consecutive requests each for ultrasound, chest x-ray (CXR), and CT. They studied them for use of abbreviations and symbols. CT request cards contained significantly more abbreviations, but also had more words per card.
To understand the abbreviations, knowing the clinical context was essential in 13% of cases for chest x-ray, 11% for ultrasound, and 5% for CT. The review panel felt the clinical context was necessary for the following abbreviations: A/E (air entry, accident and emergency), PT (patient, prothrombin time), temp (temperature, temporary), B/L (bilateral, basal), Ca (calcium, cancer), C (cancer, creatinine), v (versus, venous), mm (malignant melanoma, multiple myeloma, millimeter), RT (radiotherapy, right), OA (on admission, osteoarthritis).
“All the intended meanings were evident when the clinical context was revealed,” Pal said. “We therefore conclude that abbreviations are a safe form of communication in radiology. The vast majority of abbreviations are readily comprehensible. However, there is a considerable legibility-dependent aspect if cards are handwritten, meaning that even accepted abbreviations may be misinterpreted.”
Due diligence by the referring clinician is vital, with careful use of abbreviations only where appropriate. Radiologists must contact clinicians when doubt persists, and it may even be worthwhile compiling a list of banned abbreviations in radiology, the authors concluded.
AI Facilitates Nearly 83 Percent Improvement in Turnaround Time for Fracture X-Rays
December 19th 2023In addition to offering a 98.5 percent sensitivity rate in diagnosing fractures on X-ray, an emerging artificial intelligence (AI) software reportedly helped reduce mean turnaround time on X-ray fracture diagnosis from 48 hours to 8.3 hours, according to new research presented at the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) conference.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Can an Emerging PET Radiotracer Enhance Detection of Prostate Cancer Recurrence?
December 14th 2023The use of 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI demonstrated a 35 percent higher sensitivity rate than MRI alone for the diagnosis of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer, according to research recently presented at the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) conference.
RSNA 2020: Addressing Healthcare Disparities and Access to Care
December 4th 2020Rich Heller, M.D., with Radiology Partners, and Lucy Spalluto, M.D., with Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, discuss the highlights of their RSNA 2020 session on health disparities, focusing on the underlying factors and challenges radiologists face to providing greater access to care.
Can AI Improve Detection of Extraprostatic Extension on MRI?
December 4th 2023Utilizing a deep learning-based AI algorithm to differentiate between diagnostic and non-diagnostic quality of prostate MRI facilitated a 10 percent higher specificity rate for diagnosing extraprostatic extension on multiparametric MRI, according to research presented at the recent RSNA conference.
Study: Regular Mammography Screening Reduces Breast Cancer Mortality Risk by More than 70 Percent
November 30th 2023Consistent adherence to the five most recent mammography screenings prior to a breast cancer diagnosis reduced breast cancer death risk by 72 percent in comparison to women who did not have the mammography screening, according to new research findings presented at the annual Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) conference.