Can Supplemental Molecular Breast Imaging Enhance Breast Cancer Detection in Women with Dense Breasts?

News
Article

The combination of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and molecular breast imaging (MBI) offered more than double the detection of invasive breast cancer with DBT in the first year of screening, according to a prospective study of nearly 3,000 women with dense breasts.

For women with dense breasts, new research suggests that supplemental molecular breast imaging (MBI) more than doubles the detection of invasive breast cancer in comparison to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) alone.

For the multicenter prospective study, recently published in Radiology, researchers compared DBT versus the combination of DBT and prevalence screening MBI in 2,978 women with dense breasts (mean age of 56.8). All women in the cohort had two rounds of breast cancer screening and had a mean lifetime Tyrer-Cuzick risk of 12 percent, according to the study.

The researchers found a cancer detection rate (CDR) of 5 percent for DBT and 11.8 percent for those who had DBT and MBI at the first year of screening. At the second year of screening, the CDR for DBT was 5.8 percent in comparison to 9.3 percent for DBT and MBI.

Can Supplemental Molecular Breast Imaging Enhance Breast Cancer Detection in Women with Dense Breasts?

Here one can see a screening DBT image (A), molecular breast imaging (MBI) (B) and breast ultrasound (C) for a 62-year-old woman. While DBT was interpreted as negative, the MBI view revealed a 0.9-cm non-mass focal area of uptake at year one and ultrasound showed a suspicious mass 4 cm from the nipple. Subsequent biopsy results confirmed grade 2 invasive ductal carcinoma. (Images courtesy of Radiology.)

“To our knowledge, this is the first multicenter prospective evaluation of molecular breast imaging (MBI) as a supplement to digital breast tomosynthesis in women with dense breasts and average risk. In this trial, MBI depicted an additional 6.7 cancers per 1000 screenings at year 1 (prevalence round) and an additional 3.5 cancers per 1000 screenings at year 2 (incidence round),” wrote lead study author Carrie B. Hruska, Ph.D., who is affiliated with the Department of Radiology at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and colleagues.

The study authors determined that the invasive CDR at year one was 3 percent for DBT in contrast to 7.7 percent for DBT and MBI. For the second year of screening, the researchers found a 1.5 percent invasive CDR for DBT and a 3.9 percent invasive CDR for DBT and MBI.

While acknowledging a 3.2 percent decline of incremental CDR from year one to year two with supplemental MBI, the researchers maintained that the addition of MBI maintained a significant impact for detecting invasive breast cancer.

“ … MBI still depicted more than twice as many invasive cancers and four times as many advanced cancers as DBT did at year 2,” pointed out Hruska and colleagues.

Three Key Takeaways

  1. Higher cancer detection with MBI. Supplemental molecular breast imaging (MBI) more than doubled the invasive breast cancer detection rate compared to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) alone in women with dense breasts.
  2. Early detection advantage. Over 90 percent of cancers detected only by MBI were node-negative, indicating earlier-stage disease identification and potential for improved outcomes.
  3. Sustained benefit across screening rounds. Although incremental detection declined in the second screening year, MBI still revealed more than twice as many invasive cancers and four times as many advanced cancers as DBT alone.

For 29 patients who had cancers detected solely with supplemental MBI, the study authors pointed out that 21 of these patients had invasive breast cancer and six patients had advanced cancer presentations. Additionally, 26 of these patients had node-negative cancers, according to the researchers.

“Ninety percent of cancers detected only with MBI were node negative, indicating that MBI screening provides early detection. Additionally, 20% of those cancers were advanced, suggesting that MBI can reveal a reservoir of mammographically occult, clinically important disease with lethal potential, possibly having escaped detection over multiple mammographic screens,” emphasized Hruska and colleagues.

(Editor’s note: For related content, see “Study Suggests Benefits of FDG PET/CT for Detecting Oligometastatic Breast Cancer,” “Can Radioligand Therapy Have an Impact for Women with Breast Cancer?” and “Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Study Assesses Impact of Architectural Distortion on Malignancy Rates.”)

In regard to study limitations, the researchers acknowledged the lack of randomization and the assessment of MBI as a supplement to DBT as opposed to evaluation as a separate screening modality.

Newsletter

Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.

Recent Videos
Diagnostic Imaging's Weekly Scan: September 21 — September 27
Diagnostic Imaging's Weekly Scan: September 14 — September 20
Leading Breast Radiologists Discuss Rise of Breast Cancer Incidence in Women Under 40
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.