Back in the dark ages, when publications were first going digital, I observed that moving from typewriters and paper to video display terminals didn't really make the job any easier, as I had once imagined it would; it just allowed me to do more work. Today, I find that overflowing digital data streams actually add to my job stress.
Back in the dark ages, when publications were first going digital, I observed that moving from typewriters and paper to video display terminals didn't really make the job any easier, as I had once imagined it would; it just allowed me to do more work. Today, I find that overflowing digital data streams actually add to my job stress.
As the digital environment spreads through radiology, I suspect many radiologists are feeling the same way. Certainly, the shift to digital imaging allows you to read more images, but it also piles on patient history, plenty of priors, and a series of classic cases that may shed light on yours. All of this, as you know, adds up and may make an already stressful job even more so.
Although stress in the workplace in general has received a lot of attention, no one has addressed the impact digital imaging has had on stress in the digital radiology workplace. Until now.
In a unique project described in this issue of Diagnostic Imaging, digital luminaries Dr. Bruce Reiner and Dr. Eliot Siegel introduce a survey designed to evaluate how radiologists deal with stress in the workplace. All responses are strictly anonymous. It is hoped that data gathered in the survey will lead to a better understanding of what factors contribute to stress for radiologists and, correspondingly, how the digital environment can be adjusted to reduce those stress levels.
It's a topic that's long overdue for examination. Please take a look at the introduction to the project ("Stress reflects march of progress dichotomy," page 23) and then take a few minutes from your stressful day to complete the survey. You may find it fun, informative, and maybe a little therapeutic. In the long run, your participation may yield data that will make your work just a little bit less stressful. The survey is online at
John C. Hayes is editor of Diagnostic Imaging.
Study Reaffirms Low Risk for csPCa with Biopsy Omission After Negative Prostate MRI
December 19th 2024In a new study involving nearly 600 biopsy-naïve men, researchers found that only 4 percent of those with negative prostate MRI had clinically significant prostate cancer after three years of active monitoring.
Study Examines Impact of Deep Learning on Fast MRI Protocols for Knee Pain
December 17th 2024Ten-minute and five-minute knee MRI exams with compressed sequences facilitated by deep learning offered nearly equivalent sensitivity and specificity as an 18-minute conventional MRI knee exam, according to research presented recently at the RSNA conference.
Can Radiomics Bolster Low-Dose CT Prognostic Assessment for High-Risk Lung Adenocarcinoma?
December 16th 2024A CT-based radiomic model offered over 10 percent higher specificity and positive predictive value for high-risk lung adenocarcinoma in comparison to a radiographic model, according to external validation testing in a recent study.