“Radiology is easy. Anyone can do it.” Sound familiar? The reality is that lots of folks would really like to do what we do. But few can actually do it.
You’ve heard it all before, lots of times:
“You guys have it made down here in radiology.”
Or perhaps, “I should have been a radiologist.”
How about the quintessential quip, “Radiology is easy. Anyone can do it.”
Or even worse yet, “People that go into radiology are the ones that washed out or couldn’t make it in regular medicine.”
Sound familiar?
When faced with uninformed clinical colleagues or others advertising their ignorance by spewing similar catchphrases, I openly smile and retort with something like: “Not so loud. We don’t want others to know how good we really do have it here in radiology.”
Then there is the usual banter back and forth, but because time is important and there are always plenty of cases to read, I direct the conversation by suggesting something like: “I can understand why you’d want to be a radiologist. After all, it’s the best specialty there is. But you know, I do have academic connections and I can give you a recommendation for a residency program if you really want. It would only be four more years of training and then you could do what I do. Are you really interested?”
Of course they are not really interested and really only wanted a chance to grouse about things or needle me out of jealousy. After pleasantries are exchanged our tete-a-tete concludes and they go on their way. I would imagine these kinds of interchanges occur every day all over the country.
At least for me, these discussions resurrect Buffalo Springfield’s smash hit opening lyrics, “There’s something happening here, what it is ain’t exactly clear.” What is clear is that lots of folks would really like to do what we do. The reality is that few can actually do it. What is clear is that slots in radiology residency training programs have become much more competitive in recent years as the attraction of radiology has grown.
The reality is that fewer and fewer physicians can compete for those coveted slots. What is clear is that almost every practicing radiologist can truthfully say, “I have academic connections,” since we know radiologists in academic practices or have maintained some connection to previous training program faculty. The reality is that very few, if any, of these clinicians really want to be a radiologist.
This clarification of what is really happening here should empower us. We converse tongue in cheek, but realize that almost none of them could do what we do, any more than we could do what they do. The difference is that radiologists don’t want to do what they do. These kinds of conversations don’t happen in reverse. The radiologist does not go to the clinician with similar complaints.
We really do have it made. Sure we have challenges; perhaps more than any of us care to deal with. But that’s what makes our specialty so exciting. We have the privilege (and expectation) to attack diagnostic dilemmas, discover unexpected findings and suggest solutions to any number of patient care situations on a daily basis.
I say bring it on. Welcome the wordplay. It only reinforces the reason we chose to be radiologists. Recall the glory days of Michael Jordan and the Chicago Bulls. Everyone in the country wanted to “be like Mike.” Fast forward to the present day. I believe the root cause of this kind of clinical chatter is that they want to be like us. I much prefer our position.
Study Reaffirms Low Risk for csPCa with Biopsy Omission After Negative Prostate MRI
December 19th 2024In a new study involving nearly 600 biopsy-naïve men, researchers found that only 4 percent of those with negative prostate MRI had clinically significant prostate cancer after three years of active monitoring.
Study Examines Impact of Deep Learning on Fast MRI Protocols for Knee Pain
December 17th 2024Ten-minute and five-minute knee MRI exams with compressed sequences facilitated by deep learning offered nearly equivalent sensitivity and specificity as an 18-minute conventional MRI knee exam, according to research presented recently at the RSNA conference.
Can Radiomics Bolster Low-Dose CT Prognostic Assessment for High-Risk Lung Adenocarcinoma?
December 16th 2024A CT-based radiomic model offered over 10 percent higher specificity and positive predictive value for high-risk lung adenocarcinoma in comparison to a radiographic model, according to external validation testing in a recent study.