• AI
  • Molecular Imaging
  • CT
  • X-Ray
  • Ultrasound
  • MRI
  • Facility Management
  • Mammography

Reconsider Necessity of Screening Mammography Plus Screening MRI

Article

The value of screening mammography when added to screening MRI in women who are at high risk for breast cancer.

Women at high risk for developing breast cancer do not benefit from adding screening mammography to screening MR imaging, according to a study published in Radiology.

Researchers from Canada and Australia performed a retrospective review to evaluate the value of mammography in detecting breast cancer in high-risk women undergoing screening breast MR imaging. They obtained data from 3,934 screening studies from 1,249 high-risk women; 1,977 studies were screening MR imaging examinations and 1,957 studies were screening mammograms. All were performed between January 2012 and July 2014. Performance measures including recall and cancer detection rates, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were calculated for both mammography and MR imaging.

The results showed 45 cancers were diagnosed overall, 33 invasive and 12 ductal carcinomas in situ. Forty-three of the cancers were detected with MR imaging alone and 14 with both mammography and MR imaging. Additional tests (further imaging and/or biopsy) were recommended in 461 screening MR imaging studies, a recall rate of 23.3%, and mammography required further testing in 217 cases, a recall rate of 11.1%.

Further findings included:

 
MRI
Mammography
Cancer Detection Rate
21.8 cancers per 1,000 examinations
7.2 cancers per 1,000 examinations
Sensitivity
96%
31%
Specificity
78%
89%
Positive Predictive Value for Recalls
9.3%
6.5%

 

 

 

The researchers concluded that adding screening mammography to screening MR imaging for women who are high risk for breast cancer did not have added value in detection of breast cancer. “Routine use of screening mammography in women undergoing screening breast MR imaging warrants reconsideration,” they wrote.

Recent Videos
Radiology Study Finds Increasing Rates of Non-Physician Practitioner Image Interpretation in Office Settings
Addressing the Early Impact of National Breast Density Notification for Mammography Reports
Where the USPSTF Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations Fall Short: An Interview with Stacy Smith-Foley, MD
A Closer Look at MRI-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
Improving the Quality of Breast MRI Acquisition and Processing
Can Diffusion Microstructural Imaging Provide Insights into Long Covid Beyond Conventional MRI?
Emerging MRI and PET Research Reveals Link Between Visceral Abdominal Fat and Early Signs of Alzheimer’s Disease
Nina Kottler, MD, MS
Practical Insights on CT and MRI Neuroimaging and Reporting for Stroke Patients
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.