Radiology residents who take phone calls in the reading room may become distracted, reducing their diagnostic accuracy.
Phone calls to on-call radiologists are distracting and may negatively affect diagnostic accuracy, according to a study published in the journal Academic Radiology.
Researchers from the Indiana University School of Medicine sought to determine if distractions, like telephone calls, in the radiology reading room affected the diagnostic accuracy of radiology residents during off-hour coverage.
The researchers identified phone call times and durations over a 13-month period by examining radiology resident discrepancy reports and reading room logs from an academic tertiary care pediatric hospital. The researchers identified major discrepancy shifts. These were defined as a call shift where at least one major discrepancy was discovered the following morning by the attending radiologist between the resident preliminary and attending final reports. They also identified dictation time stamps for each discrepant preliminary dictation recorded. The researchers then compared telephone call volume and preliminary report time stamps were either “discrepancy shifts” or “no discrepancy shifts.” Each call shift lasted 14 hours. In the morning, major discrepancies were logged.
The results showed that there were 51 major discrepancies in 41 shifts. Thirty-nine of these discrepancies had documented error details and resident preliminary report time stamps.
“The average number of telephone calls for the “discrepancy shifts” was slightly greater than the “no discrepancy shifts” (48.59 versus 44.02) but was not statistically significant,” the authors wrote. “However, there was a statistically significant increase in the average number of phone calls in the one hour preceding the generation of a discrepant preliminary report versus the “no discrepancy shifts” (4.23 versus 3.24 calls). One additional phone call during the hour preceding the generation of a discrepant preliminary report resulted in a 12% increased likelihood of a resident error.”
The researchers concluded that efforts should be made to limit distractions, such as phone calls, to reduce the risk of major discrepancies in image readings.
Seven Takeaways from New CT and MRI Guidelines for Ovarian Cancer Staging
January 20th 2025In an update of previous guidelines from the European Society of Urogenital Radiology published in 2010, a 21-expert panel offered consensus recommendations on the utility of CT, MRI and PET-CT in the staging and follow-up imaging for patients with ovarian cancer.
Four Strategies to Address the Tipping Point in Radiology
January 17th 2025In order to flip the script on the impact of the radiology workforce shortage, radiology groups and practices need to make sound investments in technologies and leverage partnerships to mitigate gaps in coverage and maximize workflow efficiencies.
Can AI Bolster Breast Cancer Detection in DBT Screening?
January 16th 2025In sequential breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), true positive examinations had more than double the AI case score of true negative examinations and the highest positive AI score changes from previous exams, according to new research.