Radiologists provide more than 'reads'
The concept that radiologists provide "reads," as opposed to professional interpretation services, is degrading to the profession and misleading to those outside of our profession. It plays into the hands of all who seek to minimize and undervalue our work.
A comment regarding the editorial by John C. Hayes, "Radiology could face disruption under 'spot market' for image reads" (September, page 5).
The concept that radiologists provide "reads," as opposed to professional interpretation services, is degrading to the profession and misleading to those outside of our profession. It plays into the hands of all who seek to minimize and undervalue our work. If we as radiologists accept this "reads" label, then we will get what we deserve-relegation to commodity status with our work farmed out to the lowest bidder.
It is contradictory to insist that we are physicians concerned with the well-being and medical care of our patients and then allow our services to be treated as an auto manufacturer (payer) might treat a car part (read) placed on a vehicle (examination) by a worker (radiologist) as it traverses an assembly line (imaging service encounter).
James B. Ball Jr., M.D.
Longwood, FL
Study Shows No Impact of Hormone Therapy on PET/CT with 18F-Piflufolastat in PCa Imaging
May 7th 2025For patients with recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer, new research findings showed no significant difference in the sensitivity of 18F-piflufolastat PET/CT between patients on concurrent hormone therapy and those without hormone therapy.
