Interventions targeting radiologist factors may help reduce unwarranted variation in screening recalls.
Radiologist annual reading volume and experience affects mammography screening recall rates, according to a study published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.
Researchers from Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Mass., undertook a retrospective study to evaluate patient, radiologist, and examination characteristics affecting screening mammography recall rates and to identify modifiable factors that could reduce recall variation.
The researchers reviewed screening mammographic examinations in female patients interpreted by 13 breast imaging specialists at an academic center and two outpatient centers from October 1, 2012, to May 31, 2015. The researchers looked at BI-RADS assignment, and current and prior screening examination findings. Radiologists’ annual screening volumes, clinical experience, and concentration in breast imaging were calculated, and risk aversion, stress from uncertainty, and malpractice concerns were derived via survey.
The results showed that 5,678 of 61,198 screening examinations (9.3 percent) were recalled. Patient and radiologist characteristics associated with higher odds of recall included:
• Patient’s age younger than 50 years
• Prior mammographic findings
• Calcification
• Mass
• Higher density category
• Baseline examination
• Annual reading volume of fewer than 1,250 examinations
• Fewer than 10 years of experience
Radiologist’s risk aversion, stress from uncertainty, malpractice concerns, and cancer detection rates were not associated with higher recall rates.
The researchers concluded that interventions targeting radiologist factors may help reduce unwarranted variation in screening recall.
FDA Clears Updated AI Platform for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
November 12th 2024Employing advanced deep learning convolutional neural networks, ProFound Detection Version 4.0 reportedly offers a 50 percent improvement in detecting cancer in dense breasts in comparison to the previous version of the software.
Is the Kaiser Score More Effective than BI-RADS for Assessing Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and MRI?
October 14th 2024For women with breast-enhanced masses, Kaiser scoring (KS) demonstrated a 20 percent higher AUC than BI-RADS classification for contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and was comparable to KS for breast MRI.