Keith Dreyer, DO, PhD, FACR, FSIIM, a well-known expert on meaningful use in radiology, offers his take on the findings of this recent survey.
Diagnostic Imaging spoke with Keith Dreyer, DO, PhD, FACR, FSIIM, a well-known expert on meaningful use in radiology who assisted with this survey. Dreyer is vice chairman of radiology at Massachusetts General Hospital, associate professor of radiology at Harvard Medical School and chairman of the ACR Informatics Committee. Here’s his take on a few of the findings:
The survey found that 72 percent of radiology professionals are participating in meaningful use. Does that high percentage surprise you?
I think that people are going to find that it’s surprisingly high, because I think if you talked to folks two years ago that number was extremely low. As I give presentations in the area, there are a lot of people who ask the questions that are still trying to decide what to do or they have a difficult situation.
What I don’t get a good handle on is the denominator: those people that are doing something already and don’t need to come to a lecture. I’m pleased that number is that high.
[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"12124","attributes":{"alt":"","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_6334542365928","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"312","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"float: right; margin: 5px; height: 143px; width: 130px;","title":" ","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]What are the issues you’re hearing from radiology professionals?
Let me dance ahead to the statistic that says 8 out of 10 can work with the managers of their CEHRT to be included on meaningful use threshold dashboards. It must be the two out of ten that come to me. They are challenged with the fact that they either have managers of their CEHRT that won’t allow them to work with their dashboards or they don’t have a manager of a CEHRT and they are trying to figure out how to get a CEHRT put in in some capacity. Those are the two categories I hear from.
What’s your advice for radiologists who are trying to work more closely with the manager of their CEHRT?
They have to be able to first identify who is in charge of the meaningful use effort. Even if maybe the CEHRT was purchased by the CIO, often times the chief medical officer or chief medical information officer is typically in charge of these activities. A chairman or an individual who is IT savvy in the radiology group needs to meet with this individual and take information to show them they are eligible and that they would be compliant just by virtue of using that CEHRT.
Another item in the survey found that of those who have attested to meaningful use, one out of four has been audited. Does that surprise you?
That’s much more than I would have thought. I’d love to go back to those people and [ask them to] share your experiences here. I haven’t talked to any individual that’s been audited.
Any other advice for radiologists?
The one message that gets lost often is that even though the penalties are going to begin in 2015, penalties are based on your participation in the program two years earlier. This year is an important year to start participating.
Study Reaffirms Low Risk for csPCa with Biopsy Omission After Negative Prostate MRI
December 19th 2024In a new study involving nearly 600 biopsy-naïve men, researchers found that only 4 percent of those with negative prostate MRI had clinically significant prostate cancer after three years of active monitoring.
Study Examines Impact of Deep Learning on Fast MRI Protocols for Knee Pain
December 17th 2024Ten-minute and five-minute knee MRI exams with compressed sequences facilitated by deep learning offered nearly equivalent sensitivity and specificity as an 18-minute conventional MRI knee exam, according to research presented recently at the RSNA conference.
Can Radiomics Bolster Low-Dose CT Prognostic Assessment for High-Risk Lung Adenocarcinoma?
December 16th 2024A CT-based radiomic model offered over 10 percent higher specificity and positive predictive value for high-risk lung adenocarcinoma in comparison to a radiographic model, according to external validation testing in a recent study.