In response to a recent JACR article, the managing partner at one teleradiology company argues that not all teleradiology companies are predatory and competitive. Most in the industry benefit radiologists, he argues, by providing cost-effective technologies, streamlined administrative duties, and improved quality of care.
There’s something on most teleradiology professionals’ minds: a recent article titled “Outsourcing to Teleradiology Companies: Bad for Radiology, Bad for Radiologists,” published by the Journal of the American College of Radiology.
The controversial article labels teleradiology as an industry fueled by predatory practices and the displacement of hospital contracts. It goes on to state that radiology groups outsourcing night and weekend call coverage are surrendering the majority of their primary responsibilities as specialty physicians, while contributing to the overall decline of the industry as a whole.
After reading, I thought it would be important to discuss the issues at hand.
As most know, teleradiology was created to serve as a complimentary, value-added service for facilities to help enhance patient care and provide relief to existing staff. Teleradiology was not intended to be influenced by predatory practices, Wall Street, and shareholder wealth. Although a reoccurring theme in this article suggests the opposite, it clearly does not apply to all providers.
Many teleradiology entities do not compete in any way with radiology groups and would not read for independent diagnostic testing facilities or for non-radiologist physicians.
When it comes to radiology physicians “surrendering their responsibilities,” teleradiology providers understand this is not at all the case. High-quality teleradiology practices works seamlessly with on-site radiologists to ensure all responsibilities are met. A good provider also ensures physician-to-physician communication; teleradiologists are immediately available to discuss a case with the referring physician over the phone, and all critical results are called in by the interpreting radiologist. It’s obvious this process assists with the radiology specialty and results in around-the-clock service.
It is evident the authors of this piece failed to recognize the many benefits teleradiology brings to the table. For those lacking extensively trained radiologists, teleradiologists are available to consult and read on cases to assist the group. Teleradiology practices also provide proven, cost-effective technologies and systems to remotely transmit and read images, streamline administrative tasks, and provide other efficiencies that shorten turnaround time and improve quality of care.
Most teleradiology providers are also willing to assist in any way possible, whether a practice needs to support off-site radiologists, centralize work lists, or obtain additional staffing or introductions to other groups to create synergies.
While some teleradiology services make a name for themselves through unprofessional and unethical practices, the majority of providers operate with radiologists and patients in mind. It is these true, customer-driven providers that can, and will, combat the negative influences in the industry by simply staying in tune with their hospital partners and with each other for continuous, value-added service.
Joe Moock is a managing partner at StatRad, a teleradiology solutions provider based in San Diego. The company’s U.S.-trained, board-certified radiologists and staff deliver interpretations and programs aimed at increasing efficiency and improving patient care.
Study Reaffirms Low Risk for csPCa with Biopsy Omission After Negative Prostate MRI
December 19th 2024In a new study involving nearly 600 biopsy-naïve men, researchers found that only 4 percent of those with negative prostate MRI had clinically significant prostate cancer after three years of active monitoring.
Study Examines Impact of Deep Learning on Fast MRI Protocols for Knee Pain
December 17th 2024Ten-minute and five-minute knee MRI exams with compressed sequences facilitated by deep learning offered nearly equivalent sensitivity and specificity as an 18-minute conventional MRI knee exam, according to research presented recently at the RSNA conference.
Can Radiomics Bolster Low-Dose CT Prognostic Assessment for High-Risk Lung Adenocarcinoma?
December 16th 2024A CT-based radiomic model offered over 10 percent higher specificity and positive predictive value for high-risk lung adenocarcinoma in comparison to a radiographic model, according to external validation testing in a recent study.