In what is possibly the largest study in its kind, Harvard University researchers have shown that PET/CT can reliably tell whether unsuspected adrenal lesions discovered while managing oncologic patients are benign or malignant.
Suspicious adrenal lesion detected by CT but without FDG-PET uptake. (Provided by G. Boland)
In what is possibly the largest study in its kind, Harvard University researchers have shown that PET/CT can reliably tell whether unsuspected adrenal lesions discovered while managing oncologic patients are benign or malignant.
Incidental adrenal lesions in patients with cancer require accurate characterization because this can significantly affect staging, therapy, and prognosis. Several imaging tests are available to offer a helping hand, including contrast/noncontrast CT and MRI. None, however, has proven conclusive. A study of 38 patients found PET/CT to be sensitive and specific for the characterization of incidental adrenal lesions. The results encouraged an investigative group led by Dr. Giles W. L. Boland, an associate professor of radiology at Massachusetts General Hospital, to validate the findings in a larger cohort of patients. Between October 2004 and March 2007, Boland and colleagues evaluated 150 patients with varied malignancies, including lymphoma and lung, head and neck, and colorectal cancer. All patients underwent noncontrast PET/CT and a follow-up CT scan six months later. The researchers confirmed that PET/CT was highly effective for differentiating benign from malignant adrenal disease in this patient population. Based on a qualitative analysis, PET/CT yielded a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values for characterization of benign adrenal "incidentalomas" of 100%, 97%, 98%, 87% and 100%, respectively.Boland cautioned the study had several limitations, including the retrospective nature of the sample. He called for careful consideration of many other criteria, including Hounsfield unit and standardized uptake value measurements, adrenal wash-outs, and lesion size assessments. But the findings showed a way forward, he said."PET/CT is indeed an accurate test," Boland said.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
New DEXA Scan Study Links Thyroid Medication Levothyroxine to Higher Bone Loss Risk in Seniors
November 25th 2024Use of the medication levothyroxine, commonly prescribed for hypothyroidism, was associated with greater long-term loss of total body bone mass in seniors, according to new DEXA research to be presented at the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) conference.
RSNA 2020: Addressing Healthcare Disparities and Access to Care
December 4th 2020Rich Heller, M.D., with Radiology Partners, and Lucy Spalluto, M.D., with Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, discuss the highlights of their RSNA 2020 session on health disparities, focusing on the underlying factors and challenges radiologists face to providing greater access to care.
Is Contrast-Enhanced Mammography a Viable Option for Diagnosing Invasive Lobular Carcinoma?
December 15th 2023Contrast-enhanced mammography had a 98 percent sensitivity rate for diagnosing invasive lobular carcinoma and provided high conspicuity for 82 percent of detected lesions, according to research presented at the recent Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) conference.
Can an Emerging PET Radiotracer Enhance Detection of Prostate Cancer Recurrence?
December 14th 2023The use of 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI demonstrated a 35 percent higher sensitivity rate than MRI alone for the diagnosis of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer, according to research recently presented at the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) conference.