The number of false positives and callbacks dropped with peer review of screening mammography, according to a study at ACR 2016.
Peer review of all screening mammogram callback cases resulted in a reduction of recall rates following screening mammograms, according to a study presented at the 2016 annual meeting of the American College of Radiology.
Researchers from Mount Sinai Medical Center in Weston, Miami Beach, and Miami Springs, FL, undertook a study to determine if a Practice Quality Improvement Project, implemented on June 1, 2014, would reduce the incidence of false positive rates and callbacks at their facility.
For the study, all BIRADS-0 exams were additionally reviewed by a different, usually more senior radiologist and the consensus was either immediately established or the case was further discussed. The dissenting radiologist would assign final assessment and recommendations. Additionally, group management conducted supplementary training of the front desk staff to encourage patients to obtain prior exams prior to their scheduled screening appointments, and to assist the symptomatic patients with getting proper prescriptions from their referring physicians.
The results showed that the recall rates decreased from 22% to 13% from the beginning of the program through December 31, 2015. Individual recall rates for all breast radiologists also decreased from 18% to 9%.
The researchers concluded that the introduction of peer review of all screening callback cases resulted in a reduction of the group as well as individual recall rates to a number close to the national average, assisted in improving patient satisfaction, and served as an invaluable educational tool for their practice
AI-Initiated Recalls After Screening Mammography Demonstrate Higher PPV for Breast Cancer
March 18th 2025While recalls initiated by one of two reviewing radiologists after screening mammography were nearly 10 percent higher than recalls initiated by an AI software, the AI-initiated recalls had an 85 percent higher positive predictive value for breast cancer, according to a new study.
ECR Mammography Study: Pre-Op CEM Detects 34 Percent More Multifocal Masses than Mammography
February 28th 2025In addition to contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) demonstrating over a 90 percent detection rate for multifocal masses, researchers found that no significant difference between histological measurements and CEM, according to study findings presented at the European Congress of Radiology.
Study: Mammography AI Leads to 29 Percent Increase in Breast Cancer Detection
February 5th 2025Use of the mammography AI software had a nearly equivalent false positive rate as unassisted radiologist interpretation and resulted in a 44 percent reduction in screen reading workload, according to findings from a randomized controlled trial involving over 105,000 women.