Patients who undergo imaging tests could use more information about the examination.
Patients are not always aware of why they are undergoing radiology imaging exams, which limits their ability to participate in their own care, according to a study published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.
Researchers from NYU Langone Medical Center performed a survey-based assessment of patients’ knowledge of the radiologic imaging examinations they were about to undergo at the facility.
A total of 176 surveys were completed; 109 by women and 67 by men. Their mean age was 50. The questions asked about patient knowledge of specific aspects of the examination, as well as their experience in being educated about the examination before their appointment. The required responses were either yes/no or scale ratings of 1 to 5 in a Likert-type format. There were also a few free-response items.
Forty-five patients who completed the survey were waiting for CT imaging, 41 for MRI, and 44 for nuclear medicine.
The results showed that 166 of 171 patients (97.1%) were able to correctly identify the examination modality. Of the five who could not, four said they were having a CT, rather than MRI, ultrasound, or nuclear medicine. A total of 170 of 174 patients (97.8%) could identify the body part to be imaged.
However, only 76 of 166 patients (45.8%) could correctly identify if their examination would involve using radiation; 23 of 45 (51.1%) could say if they were receiving intravenous contrast and five of seven (71.4%) if they were receiving oral contrast.[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"34798","attributes":{"alt":"radiologists and patients","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_3858484394070","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"3707","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"height: 133px; width: 160px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 1px; float: right;","title":"©P E A R L/Shutterstock.com","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
A total of 136 of 173 (78.6%) said that the ordering physician explained the examination in advance and 72.1% of these patients said they were satisfied with the explanation they received.
Some patients reported finding information elsewhere: 38 of 174 (21.8% from the Internet, and 61 of 175 (20.5%) from family members or friends.
Overall, 121 of 171 patients (70.8%) said they had a complete or near-complete understanding of the examination. A total of 32 of 170 patients (18.8%) said they had unanswered questions about the examination, most commonly regarding examination logistics, contrast-agent usage, and when results would be available.
Level of understanding was greatest for CT and least for nuclear medicine examinations, and lower when patients had not previously undergone the given examination.
Ninety of 170 patients (52.9%) expressed interest in discussing the examination with a radiologist before having the test. Finally, a larger percentage of patients who were to undergo CT scanning had a better understanding of the upcoming test than those who were about to undergo nuclear medicine examinations.
The authors concluded that patients often don’t have a full understanding of imaging exams and better education for them could result in enhancing their empowerment and contribute to patient-centered care.
FDA Clears Virtually Helium-Free 1.5T MRI System from Siemens Healthineers
June 26th 2025Offering a cost- and resource-saving DryCool magnet technology, the Magnetom Flow.Ace MRI system reportedly requires 0.7 liters of liquid helium for cooling over the lifetime of the device in contrast to over 1,000 liters commonly utilized with conventional MRI platforms.
Can CT-Based Deep Learning Bolster Prognostic Assessments of Ground-Glass Nodules?
June 19th 2025Emerging research shows that a multiple time-series deep learning model assessment of CT images provides 20 percent higher sensitivity than a delta radiomic model and 56 percent higher sensitivity than a clinical model for prognostic evaluation of ground-glass nodules.
FDA Clears Ultrasound AI Detection for Pleural Effusion and Consolidation
June 18th 2025The 14th FDA-cleared AI software embedded in the Exo Iris ultrasound device reportedly enables automated detection of key pulmonary findings that may facilitate detection of pneumonia and tuberculosis in seconds.
Can Contrast-Enhanced Mammography be a Viable Screening Alternative to Breast MRI?
June 17th 2025While the addition of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) led to over a 13 percent increase in false positive cases, researchers also noted over double the cancer yield per 1,000 women in comparison to DBT alone.