Once upon a time, when I worked primarily in hospitals, “stat” referred to emergencies, or at least something with real urgency (such as the patient is being cleared to have surgery tomorrow morning, etc.). After leaving the inpatient (and ER) world for outpatient imaging centers, I encountered some other uses of “stat.”
Stat: (from Latin: statim)- Without delay; immediately.
Once upon a time, when I worked primarily in hospitals, “stat” referred to emergencies, or at least something with real urgency (such as the patient is being cleared to have surgery tomorrow morning, etc.). After leaving the inpatient (and ER) world for outpatient imaging centers, I encountered some other uses of “stat:”
* The patient is a VIP (or directly related to one).
* The patient is about to go on a vacation (or other travel), and wants to know results before departing.
* The patient's referring clinician is being courted so she or he will send more referrals, and every patient sent by said referrer gets priority over patients from other referrers.
* The patient's insurance requires a quick turnaround time, so patients on that plan get priority over other patients.
The variety of non-emergent “stat”s seems to grow, year by year. I still see "real" stat studies (we sometimes call them “stat stats”) from time to time. We sometimes joke about having color-coded stat stickers for patients’ charts so we can prioritize them - red emergency stats would get read before the orange VIPs, who would get read before the pink VIP referrers, etc. It seems inevitable that, sooner or later, non-stat studies will become the minority.
I've always found it rather slimy that some patients get kicked to the back of the line, just because they were unfortunate enough to get referred by the wrong clinician. It reminds me of George Orwell’s “Animal Farm:” “All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.”
Can Generative AI Facilitate Simulated Contrast Enhancement for Prostate MRI?
January 14th 2025Deep learning synthesis of contrast-enhanced MRI from non-contrast prostate MRI sequences provided an average multiscale structural similarity index of 70 percent with actual contrast-enhanced prostate MRI in external validation testing from newly published research.
Can MRI Have an Impact with Fertility-Sparing Treatments for Endometrial and Cervical Cancers?
January 9th 2025In a literature review that includes insights from recently issued guidelines from multiple European medical societies, researchers discuss the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in facilitating appropriate patient selection for fertility-sparing treatments to address early-stage endometrial and cervical cancer.