Myocardial perfusion CT, cardiac MR match up well

A preliminary study indicates that first-pass and delayed-enhancement myocardial CT correlate well with measures of infarction size gathered with equivalent cardiac MR procedures.

Dr. Koen Nieman and associates in the radiology and cardiology departments at Massachusetts General Hospital compared results from 64-slice CT and 1.5T cardiac MR performed on 21 patients within five days of a percutaneous coronary intervention to recanalize one or more coronary arteries after an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Multislice CT was performed during the first pass of an intravenous bolus of 75 to 90 mL of low isomolar contrast material to assess myocardial perfusion and detect microvascular obstructions. A second scan was performed seven minutes later in 15 patients to assess total infarct size as a percentage of total left ventricular myocardial mass using delayed hyperenhancement. The resulting early hypoenhancement and delayed hyperenhancement scans were compared with results generated with corresponding CMR procedures.

The MGH researchers detected regions of early hypoenhancement on all first-pass MSCT and cardiac MR images. Enough signal intensity was produced on the first-pass CT images to differentiate infarcted from remote myocardium and infarcted myocardium from the left ventricular cavity.

Delayed hyperenhancement appeared in all cardiac MR exams and 11 of 15 CT studies. Though the studies performed by the two modalities were deemed comparable, cardiac MRI produced a far better contrast-to-noise ratio than MSCT for the delayed enhancement sequences, and the MSCT images were noisier than their cardiac MR counterparts.

Other than that difference, the results from MSCT were similar to those from cardiac MR. Hypoenhanced areas, measured as a percentage of left ventricular cavity from first-pass CT, correlated well with first-pass MRI findings. Delayed enhancement MSCT also correlated with delayed enhancement measurements of infarction size (R² = 0.55)

The results, published in the April issue of Radiology (2008;247[1]:51-56) established that delayed-enhancement CT is a legitimate clinical alternative for patients contraindicated for MR procedures, Nieman said.

For more information from the Diagnostic Imaging archives:

Report from SCMR: Delayed enhancement predicts post-revascularization procedure risk

Consensus remains elusive for best ventricle test

News from NASCI: researchers solve artifact problem that degrades first pass MRI at 3T