• AI
  • Molecular Imaging
  • CT
  • X-Ray
  • Ultrasound
  • MRI
  • Facility Management
  • Mammography

Most Vulnerable Steps for Communication Errors in Radiology

Article

Radiologists’ errors in communication can have a direct impact on patient care.

Over one-third of communication errors that take place in a radiology department have a direct impact on patient care, and more than half have a potential impact, according to a study published in the American Journal of Roentgenology.

Researchers from the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, MA, performed a study to determine the impact of communication errors on patient care, customer satisfaction, and work-flow efficiency and to identify opportunities for quality improvement.

The researchers found 380 of 422 cases of communication errors gathered from the quality assurance database at their facility between August 1, 2004 and December 31, 2014, which fit their criteria. The cases were analyzed for where in the imaging process the errors occurred, such as during ordering, scheduling, examination performance, study interpretation, or communication of the results. The impact on patient care was then graded on a five-point scale: none (0) to catastrophic (4).

The most common step where errors occurred was during communication of the results:

Step where error occurred
Number of patients affected
Ordering
53 patients (13.9%)
Scheduling
18 patients (4.7%)
Examination performance
114 patients (30.0%)
Study interpretation
14 patients (3.7%)
Result communication
181  patients (47.6%)

There was no statistically significant difference in impact severity between errors that occurred during result communication and those that occurred at other times, the researchers noted.  According to the researchers, patient care was impacted in 144 cases (37.9%) and 200/380 (52.6%) of cases had the potential for an impact:

Impact
Number of patients affected
Step where error occurred
Minor
21 patients (5.5%)
Result communication: 13 All other steps: 8
Moderate
34 patients (8.9%)
Result communication: 12 All other steps: 22
Major
89 patients (23.4%)
Result communication: 45 All other steps: 44
No impact noted
236 patients (62.1%)
 

 

Recent Videos
Radiology Study Finds Increasing Rates of Non-Physician Practitioner Image Interpretation in Office Settings
Nina Kottler, MD, MS
The Executive Order on AI: Promising Development for Radiology or ‘HIPAA for AI’?
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.