Proposed rules announced June 30 for the 2009 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule feature provisions that could both hinder and help radiologists who perform outpatient imaging practices. The proposal, issued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, asks for a 5.4% cut in physician payments, but it also raises the possibility of harsh regulations to make it harder for nonradiologists to provide office-based imaging services.
Proposed rules announced June 30 for the 2009 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule feature provisions that could both hinder and help radiologists who perform outpatient imaging practices. The proposal, issued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, asks for a 5.4% cut in physician payments, but it also raises the possibility of harsh regulations to make it harder for nonradiologists to provide office-based imaging services.
"It could strike a blow to self-referral," said Thomas W. Greeson, J.D., a partner in the law firm of Reed Smith LLP in Falls Church, VA.
The proposed 2009 MPFS rule would require all physicians and nonphysician providers who perform diagnostic imaging in their offices to enroll and meet many standards that currently apply to independent diagnostic testing facilities (IDTFs). CMS will also impose proficiency requirements to all supervising physicians and proposes restricting supervising physicians from overseeing more than three IDTFs.
Currently, CMS administrative contractors allow only board-certified radiologists to be the supervising physicians for radiology studies performed in IDTFs. The proposed measures, designed to improve cost efficiencies in the system, would also make it extremely hard for many physician practices to qualify to provide in-office imaging services.
"(The proposed rule) may drive many nonradiologists out of the office-based imaging practice," Greeson told Diagnostic Imaging.
The 2009 MPFS also proposes modifying antimarkup rules. On one hand, it will narrow the definition of an office practice in relation to the technical component of imaging services (where services are rendered and by whom). On the other, CMS proposes to stop reassignment of payment rights by allowing the physician responsible for the professional component (interpretation service) to bill CMS directly.
In an unexpected move, CMS did not revisit possible reforms to federal Stark self-referral regulations that it invited interested parties to discuss last year before setting its 2008 Physician Fee Schedule. Many had expected to see such reforms in this year's proposal.
CMS proposed additional changes to the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative. It allows eligible physicians to earn incentive payments in exchange for reporting quality measures related to their clinical practice. The 2009 MPFS also promotes the use of electronic health records to improve efficiency and coordination among providers and to reduce malpractice.
The proposal could potentially improve the quality of imaging in physicians' offices. It is likely to face significant opposition from representatives of physicians who have imaging in their own offices, Greeson said. It could prove a boon for radiologists, however.
"Radiologists are going to be very happy with the proposed rule, particularly the requirements that are designed to try to curtail self-referral," Greeson said.
The document is pending publication in the Federal Register. CMS will accept comments on the proposed rule until Aug. 29 and will issue its final rule by Nov. 1. The revised policies and payment rates will become effective Jan. 1, 2009. For more information, visit the online CMS Physician Center
For more information from the Diagnostic Imaging archives:
CMS decision didn't come out of the blue
Medicare takes aim at self-referred imaging
New CMS rules will prohibit certain equipment leasing arrangements
Study Reaffirms Low Risk for csPCa with Biopsy Omission After Negative Prostate MRI
December 19th 2024In a new study involving nearly 600 biopsy-naïve men, researchers found that only 4 percent of those with negative prostate MRI had clinically significant prostate cancer after three years of active monitoring.
Study Examines Impact of Deep Learning on Fast MRI Protocols for Knee Pain
December 17th 2024Ten-minute and five-minute knee MRI exams with compressed sequences facilitated by deep learning offered nearly equivalent sensitivity and specificity as an 18-minute conventional MRI knee exam, according to research presented recently at the RSNA conference.
Can Radiomics Bolster Low-Dose CT Prognostic Assessment for High-Risk Lung Adenocarcinoma?
December 16th 2024A CT-based radiomic model offered over 10 percent higher specificity and positive predictive value for high-risk lung adenocarcinoma in comparison to a radiographic model, according to external validation testing in a recent study.