• AI
  • Molecular Imaging
  • CT
  • X-Ray
  • Ultrasound
  • MRI
  • Facility Management
  • Mammography

A Look at 115-Year-Old X-Ray Equipment

Article

X-ray equipment has become far more sophisticated in the last 115 years - and uses far lower radiation doses and exposure times, researchers found recently after testing a first-generation system from 1896.

X-ray equipment has become far more sophisticated in the last 115 years - and uses far lower radiation doses and exposure times, researchers found recently after testing a first-generation system from 1896.

The researchers dug up equipment collecting dust in a warehouse in Maastricht, the Netherlands. A year ago, Jos M.A. van Engelshoven, MD, PhD, former radiology head at the Maastricht University Medical Center, retrieved the equipment for a television program, and Gerrit J. Kemerink, PhD, from Maastricht University Medical Center, decided to analyze the system. A study on the findings, which the authors said was the first quantitative data about radiation dose and other properties of the first X-ray systems, was published in Radiology.

“Our experience with this machine, which had a buzzing interrupter, crackling lightning within a spark gap, and a greenish light flashing in a tube; which spread the smell of ozone; and which revealed internal structures in the human body was, even today, little less than magical,” the authors wrote. “Clearly, this technique left ample room for improvement.”

William Roentgen first reported his X-ray discovery on December 28, 1896. About a month later, H.J. Hoffmans, a physicist and high school director, and L. Th. van Kleef, a medical doctor and director of a local hospital, used this technology to acquire images of human anatomy.  The pair used an X-ray system built from equipment from Hoffmans’ high school, including a high-voltage transformer and a glass bulb with metal electrodes at each end.

Since then, the equipment has indeed improved, and radiation dose and exposure time were lowered by three to five orders of magnitude, respectively, researchers found.

Using the same exposure conditions used in 1896, the skin dose needed to image a hand was nearly 1,500 times greater on the legacy system (74 milligrays versus 0.05 milligrays). Exposure times were 90 minutes for the old system and 21 milliseconds for today’s systems.

Not surprisingly, the old-school system caused serious health problems, such as eye complaints, skin burns, and hair loss within weeks of Roentgen’s discovery. Many X-ray operators had severe hand damage over time, researchers said.

Recent Videos
Current and Emerging Insights on AI in Breast Imaging: An Interview with Mark Traill, Part 1
Addressing Cybersecurity Issues in Radiology
Computed Tomography Study Shows Emergence of Silicosis in Engineered Stone Countertop Workers
Can an Emerging AI Software for DBT Help Reduce Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening?
Skeletal Muscle Loss and Dementia: What Emerging MRI Research Reveals
Magnetoencephalopathy Study Suggests Link Between Concussions and Slower Aperiodic Activity in Adolescent Football Players
Radiology Study Finds Increasing Rates of Non-Physician Practitioner Image Interpretation in Office Settings
Assessing a Landmark Change in CMS Reimbursement for Diagnostic Radiopharmaceuticals
Addressing the Early Impact of National Breast Density Notification for Mammography Reports
2 KOLs are featured in this series.
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.