- AI
- Molecular Imaging
- CT
- X-Ray
- Ultrasound
- MRI
- Facility Management
- Mammography
Is Pre-Imaging Biopsy Necessary for Prostate Cancer Staging in Elderly Patients?
For patients 80 years of age or older that have a PSA level at 20 ng/mL or higher, PSMA PET/CT has a high likelihood of success in diagnosing and staging prostate cancer regardless of pre-imaging biopsy use, according to newly published research.
Emerging research revealed that approximately one-third of elderly patients did not have a prostate biopsy prior to being referred for PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for prostate cancer assessment.
Noting that prostate biopsies for elderly patients have the potential for elevated risks such as infection as well as longer hospital stays, researchers assessed the use of pre-imaging biopsies or lack thereof in 100 patients 80 years of age or older who had prostate cancer staging with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT.
For the retrospective study, recently published in the Journal of Nuclear Medicine, researchers found that 34 percent of the study cohort did not have a biopsy prior to being referred for PSMA PET/CT. In addition to being five years older on average in comparison to patients who had prostate biopsies, patients without pre-imaging biopsies had significantly higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (a median PSA level of 57 ng/mL vs. 15.4 ng/mL).
One can see 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans above for an 83-year-old man who had no pre-imaging biopsy. The initial imaging (left) shows advanced prostate cancer and the right image, obtained 10 months later and after the patient underwent hormonal therapy, shows no uptake of 68Ga-PSMA-11. (Images courtesy of the Journal of Nuclear Imaging.)
The 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging also revealed that patients without a pre-imaging biopsy had nearly a 19 percent higher rate of bone metastases (47.1 percent vs. 28.8 percent) and a nearly 17 percent higher prevalence of advanced disease (50 percent vs. 33.3 percent) in comparison to patients that had pre-imaging biopsies.
“The results of the current study indicate that 100% of the elderly patients who were referred for PSMA PET/CT on the basis of clinical suspicion only (mainly a rising PSA level or prominent urinary or musculoskeletal symptoms) were found to have avid disease on PSMA PET/CT,” wrote study co-author Einat Even-Sapir, M.D., Ph.D., head of the Department of Nuclear Medicine at Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center in Israel, and colleagues.
“Given that positive PSMA PET/CT results usually indicate clinically significant rather than clinically insignificant PCa, and together with insignificant negative biologic effect of radiation exposure in elderly patients, this practice of waiving the need for (pre-imaging) biopsy when the clinical suspicion is high proves to be effective and to have no apparent negative cost.”
In regard to treatment, the researchers noted that out of 36 patients who had localized prostate cancer, 81.5 percent of patients who had pre-imaging biopsies (22 of 27 patients) were referred for definitive therapies whereas none of the nine patients with no pre-imaging biopsies received definitive treatment. For locally advanced prostate cancer, 12.5 percent of the patients without pre-imaging biopsy had pelvic radiotherapy in comparison to 88.2 percent of patients with pre-imaging biopsy.
However, the study authors noted significantly lower age and PSA levels in the patients treated with pelvic radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer. Even-Sapir and colleagues also pointed to follow-up data for 12 out of 13 patients in the no pre-imaging biopsy group who were treated with hormonal therapy for advanced disease. A mean PSA level decrease of 95.6 percent occurred for these patients and eight out nine patients with follow-up PSMA PET/CT achieved a significant decrease in disease or a stable level of disease, according to the study authors.
“When PSMA PET/CT identified advanced disease in patients who had no (pre-imaging) biopsy, as happened in half of such patients in the current study, our results indicate that the lack of tissue diagnosis did not preclude them from receiving hormonal therapy, which biochemical and imaging follow-up data indicated had been beneficial,” emphasized Even-Sapir and colleagues.
Can MRI-Based Deep Learning Improve Risk Stratification in PI-RADS 3 Cases?
January 30th 2025In external validation testing, a deep learning model demonstrated an average AUC of 87.6 percent for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCA) on prostate MRI for patients with PI-RADS 3 assessments.
Emerging PET Agent Garners Second FDA Fast Track Designation for Prostate Cancer Imaging
January 24th 2025In addition to an August FDA fast track designation for PSMA PET imaging in patients with suspected metastasis, the radiopharmaceutical 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA has earned another fast track designation for imaging of biochemical recurrence.
Study Examines Prognostic Value of Baseline PSMA PET/CT Factors in Patients with mCRPC
January 24th 2025Doubling of total tumor volume on PSMA PET/CT is 41 percent more likely to reduce overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), according to new research.
Can Deep Learning Radiomics with bpMRI Bolster Accuracy for Prostate Cancer Prognosis?
January 22nd 2025An emerging deep learning radiomics model based on biparametric MRI (bpMRI) offered a 14 to 17 percent higher AUC range than PI-RADS scoring for predicting the aggressiveness of prostate cancer, according to new research findings.
Can Generative AI Facilitate Simulated Contrast Enhancement for Prostate MRI?
January 14th 2025Deep learning synthesis of contrast-enhanced MRI from non-contrast prostate MRI sequences provided an average multiscale structural similarity index of 70 percent with actual contrast-enhanced prostate MRI in external validation testing from newly published research.
Can MRI-Based AI Enhance Risk Stratification in Prostate Cancer?
January 13th 2025Employing baseline MRI and clinical data, an emerging deep learning model was 32 percent more likely to predict the progression of low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) to clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), according to new research.
