Learn how Siemens’ FAST CARE Technology speeds up time-consuming CT procedures and simultaneously reduces dosage.
FAST CARE Technology
To give medical professionals more time to take better care of their patients, our new FAST CARE Technology accelerates workflow and lowers radiation exposure to previously unseen levels – to help you leverage untapped potentials in patient-centric productivity.
Be FAST
FAST – our Fully Assisting Scanner Technologies – make time-consuming and complex procedures faster as well as far more intuitive. Your scans will also be more reproducible and less prone to errors.
Take CARE
CARE – our Combined Applications to Reduce Exposure – provide you with excellent image quality at the right dose level..
FAST CARE Technology offers comprehensive software packages adjusted to your needs and clinical fields. In combination with syngo.via, the FAST CARE Technology helps to make the entire examination even more streamlined, helping to enable a highly-reliable diagnosis with less patient burden – from scan preparation to data evaluation.
More information about the FAST CARE Technology can be found here
Study Reaffirms Low Risk for csPCa with Biopsy Omission After Negative Prostate MRI
December 19th 2024In a new study involving nearly 600 biopsy-naïve men, researchers found that only 4 percent of those with negative prostate MRI had clinically significant prostate cancer after three years of active monitoring.
Study Examines Impact of Deep Learning on Fast MRI Protocols for Knee Pain
December 17th 2024Ten-minute and five-minute knee MRI exams with compressed sequences facilitated by deep learning offered nearly equivalent sensitivity and specificity as an 18-minute conventional MRI knee exam, according to research presented recently at the RSNA conference.
Can Radiomics Bolster Low-Dose CT Prognostic Assessment for High-Risk Lung Adenocarcinoma?
December 16th 2024A CT-based radiomic model offered over 10 percent higher specificity and positive predictive value for high-risk lung adenocarcinoma in comparison to a radiographic model, according to external validation testing in a recent study.