As a consultant, I have the opportunity to speak with many operators, vendors, payers, analysts, and banks about the future of outpatient imaging. In our conversations, I share trends, numbers, and perceived areas of growth. What they want to talk about most is financials, particularly what 2008 will bring. It’s a curiosity that these folks, no doubt, share with vendors.
As a consultant, I have the opportunity to speak with many operators, vendors, payers, analysts, and banks about the future of outpatient imaging. In our conversations, I share trends, numbers, and perceived areas of growth. What they want to talk about most is financials, particularly what 2008 will bring. It's a curiosity that these folks, no doubt, share with vendors.
Imaging centers and vendors have shared much over the past year. Little of it has been good.
Of the 6037 free-standing outpatient facilities operating at the start of 2007, 10% have closed, consolidated, or fallen into default. The Deficit Reduction Act did much of the damage, as reimbursements from 2006 withered and imaging centers felt the pinch. The number of centers may shrink another 10% in the year ahead, even though procedures are expected to grow, paradoxically, in the double digits. This continues a trend that has gone on since at least 1999.
Despite the shrinking provider base and increased demand for services, the opportunity of centers to invest in their future has all but vanished. Revolving credit lines are tapped dry. Investors aren't seeing the returns they were promised, so they're hesitant to put in more capital. And operating capital is being squeezed not only by the DRA but by utilization management companies (also known as radiology benefit management companies, or RBCs). These RBCs are clamping down on "overutilization" and privileging requirements.
In the year ahead, the influence of the RBCs is expected to grow. Already many, including MedSolutions, AIM, and NIA, manage the imaging expenditures covering more than 38 million lives. What else will centers soon face? Key trends are unmistakable. Some will make life harder for centers, some easier.
Others could have either effect, depending on how they play out:
o Hospitals will become savvier and better able to compete vigorously in the freestanding space.
Amid all these developments, there is an underlying reason for hope that the future will brighten, for both centers and equipment vendors. The combination of center closures, consolidations, and stagnated growth by entrepreneurs will begin to create enough volume for those remaining centers to become profitable. Possibly in the latter half of 2008, these volumes will justify new big-ticket purchase prices. In essence, the pendulum that has wreaked havoc in the imaging centers community will swing the other way, bringing along a period of rebuilding and growth.
Steven R. Renard is a diagnostic imaging and radiology industry consultant who has nearly 15 years of related experience, primarily in imaging center operations.
Study Reaffirms Low Risk for csPCa with Biopsy Omission After Negative Prostate MRI
December 19th 2024In a new study involving nearly 600 biopsy-naïve men, researchers found that only 4 percent of those with negative prostate MRI had clinically significant prostate cancer after three years of active monitoring.
Study Examines Impact of Deep Learning on Fast MRI Protocols for Knee Pain
December 17th 2024Ten-minute and five-minute knee MRI exams with compressed sequences facilitated by deep learning offered nearly equivalent sensitivity and specificity as an 18-minute conventional MRI knee exam, according to research presented recently at the RSNA conference.
Can Radiomics Bolster Low-Dose CT Prognostic Assessment for High-Risk Lung Adenocarcinoma?
December 16th 2024A CT-based radiomic model offered over 10 percent higher specificity and positive predictive value for high-risk lung adenocarcinoma in comparison to a radiographic model, according to external validation testing in a recent study.