Several cardiology societies have collaborated to update standards for training and utilization of cardiovascular CT and MR imaging, addressing increasingly burdensome credentialing requirements. The document applies only to cardiac applications and does not address extracardiac findings associated with cardiac imaging.
Several cardiology societies have collaborated to update standards for training and utilization of cardiovascular CT and MR imaging, addressing increasingly burdensome credentialing requirements. The document applies only to cardiac applications and does not address extracardiac findings associated with cardiac imaging.
Most cardiovascular and radiology programs lack the formal post-training education required to handle the diagnostic capabilities that CT and MRI now afford, according to the authors. A task force comprising the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, and American College of Physicians convened in 1998 to address that concern.
The task force's plan should enable physicians to offer competent cardiovascular imaging services and fulfill the requisites that healthcare institutions demand to bestow clinical privileges. The ACCF/AHA Clinical Competence Statement aims to complement current standards set by cardiology fellowships, practicing physicians, and the American College of Radiology instead of replacing them (Circulation 2005;112:598-617).
The guidelines tackle the know-how required to attain expertise in cardiovascular CT and MR imaging. They review several aspects of CT imaging:
On the MRI side, the guidelines address different topics:
As far as the clinical indications for both modalities, the guidelines focus on acquired and congenital diseases of the heart muscle, valves, pericardium, coronary arteries and veins, and pulmonary veins, and thoracic aorta. The document touches on anatomic, functional, and perfusion imaging, coronary calcium scoring, and noncalcified plaque assessment.
Noncardiac conditions such as pulmonary embolism or peripheral vascular disease, or conditions affecting the carotid, renal, and intracranial vessels are excluded.
The new standards recommend additional training in cardiovascular CT or MRI at different stages. Establishing MR competence at the independent clinical practice stage, for instance, would require three months of training and performance of 150 cases. After that, the guidelines would require 50 cases or more per year and 30 hours of continuing medical education every three years.
Proven competence on CT would require eight weeks of training and 200 cases or four weeks and 150 cases with unenhanced CT scanning. Continuing education would require 50 cases or more per year and 20 hours of CME every three years.
In addition to the ACC, the AHA, and the ACP, the following societies collaborated in the development of these guidelines:
Dr. Matthew J. Budoff, an associate professor of medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, chaired the writing committee.
For more information from the Diagnostic Imaging archives:
Cardiac service doubles patient capacity in just under two years
Cooperation over coronary CTA may doom EBCT
ACR calls report on skyrocketing imaging distorted
Study with CT Data Suggests Women with PE Have More Than Triple the One-Year Mortality Rate than Men
April 3rd 2025After a multivariable assessment including age and comorbidities, women with pulmonary embolism (PE) had a 48 percent higher risk of one-year mortality than men with PE, according to a new study involving over 33,000 patients.
Predicting Diabetes on CT Scans: What New Research Reveals with Pancreatic Imaging Biomarkers
March 25th 2025Attenuation-based biomarkers on computed tomography (CT) scans demonstrated a 93 percent interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) agreement across three pancreatic segmentation algorithms for predicting diabetes, according to a study involving over 9,700 patients.