As FDA officials consider the more than 130 industry comments on draft regulations for mobile medical apps, they are trying to strike a balance between encouraging development and ensuring safety.
As FDA officials consider the more than 130 industry comments on draft regulations for mobile medical apps, they are trying to strike a balance between encouraging development and ensuring safety.
“We are very supportive in terms of where mobile technology will take us [in] healthcare,” said Bakul Patel, an FDA policy advisor who spoke last week at the American College of Radiology’s inaugural summit on informatics in Washington, DC.
The agency published its draft guidance in July and accepted comments through last month. The guidance outlined what kinds of medical apps would be regulated by the FDA, such as those that can be used as an accessory to a medical device or those that transform a mobile computer and convert it to a medical device would ideally fall under their purview, Patel said.
Patel said many in the industry understand the intent of the regulations, but have requested more clarity.
The first mobile app for diagnostic radiology to received FDA clearance was MIM Software Inc.’s Mobile MIM, which was cleared in February after a process that started in 2008. The app was approved for viewing images and making medical diagnoses based on CT, MRI and nuclear medical technology.
Its approval seemed to signal a shift at the FDA to a greater focus on medical mobile apps.
Mark Cain, MIM Software’s CTO, who also spoke at the informatics forum, detailed the FDA’s concerns about their app and his company’s solutions to the problems. He also expressed his frustrations over the FDA’s delay in addressing the need for regulation.
“It’s a shame that it has been over three years that medical apps came into existence, and we are still debating guidance,” he said. “What has taken so long?”
Cain said the industry should have been at the FDA’s doorstep demanding the regulation, adding that some advances could have already appeared on the market. If you have a device, he told the audience, don’t wait. Go to the FDA for regulation so it can get on the market. That will allow the entire medical mobile apps industry to advance, he said.
Donna-Bea Tillman, director of regulations and policy at Microsoft Health Solutions who spend many years directing the FDA’s Office of Device Evaluation, said one reason it’s take so long is that the industry - a bit in denial - is not used to being regulated by the FDA.
She also said clinicians should be more involved, as they are the owners of best practices and standards of care. “We need to find a way for you in the clinical community to take more ownership of the rules,” she said, speaking at the forum. “The FDA isn’t used to partnering extensively with the clinical community.”
Study Reaffirms Low Risk for csPCa with Biopsy Omission After Negative Prostate MRI
December 19th 2024In a new study involving nearly 600 biopsy-naïve men, researchers found that only 4 percent of those with negative prostate MRI had clinically significant prostate cancer after three years of active monitoring.
Study Examines Impact of Deep Learning on Fast MRI Protocols for Knee Pain
December 17th 2024Ten-minute and five-minute knee MRI exams with compressed sequences facilitated by deep learning offered nearly equivalent sensitivity and specificity as an 18-minute conventional MRI knee exam, according to research presented recently at the RSNA conference.
Can Radiomics Bolster Low-Dose CT Prognostic Assessment for High-Risk Lung Adenocarcinoma?
December 16th 2024A CT-based radiomic model offered over 10 percent higher specificity and positive predictive value for high-risk lung adenocarcinoma in comparison to a radiographic model, according to external validation testing in a recent study.