Effect of Order of Readings on Breast Cancer Detection Rate
The order of mammography screenings done in pairs and its effect on breast cancer detection rates.
When two readers interpret batches of mammography screenings, the order in which who performs the first reading and who does the follow-up interpretation makes no difference in rates of detection in breast cancer, according to a study published in JAMA.
Researchers from the United Kingdom performed a multicenter, double-blind, cluster randomized trial to determine if a vigilance decrement is present when two screeners consistently interpret the first or second reading of mammographic images.
A total of 360 readers participated in the trial: 186 radiologists, 143 radiography advanced practitioners, and 31 breast clinicians. All were divided into one of four groups. The intervention group comprised pairs of readers interpreting the images in opposite order – one forward and one in reverse or vice versa; the control group comprised pairs of readers who read consistently in the same order, both forward or both in reverse. A total of 1,194,147 women participated in the trial; 596,642 were in the intervention group and 597,505 in the control group. The images were interpreted in median batches of 35 images, and each reader interpreted a median of 176 batches.[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"48928","attributes":{"alt":"Breast Screening","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_6920399043605","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"5878","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"height: 145px; width: 170px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 1px; float: right;","title":"©Sam72/Shutterstock.com","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
The results showed that after completion of all subsequent diagnostic tests, a total of 10,484 cases (0.88%) of breast cancer were detected. The researchers noted no significant difference in the cancer detection rate with 5,272 cancers (0.88%) that were found in the intervention group, compared with the 5,212 (0.87%) in the control group.
“Interpretation of batches of mammograms by qualified screening mammography readers using a different order versus the same order for reading resulted in no significant difference in rates of detection of breast cancer,” the researchers concluded.
AI-Initiated Recalls After Screening Mammography Demonstrate Higher PPV for Breast Cancer
March 18th 2025While recalls initiated by one of two reviewing radiologists after screening mammography were nearly 10 percent higher than recalls initiated by an AI software, the AI-initiated recalls had an 85 percent higher positive predictive value for breast cancer, according to a new study.
ECR Mammography Study: Pre-Op CEM Detects 34 Percent More Multifocal Masses than Mammography
February 28th 2025In addition to contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) demonstrating over a 90 percent detection rate for multifocal masses, researchers found that no significant difference between histological measurements and CEM, according to study findings presented at the European Congress of Radiology.
Study: Mammography AI Leads to 29 Percent Increase in Breast Cancer Detection
February 5th 2025Use of the mammography AI software had a nearly equivalent false positive rate as unassisted radiologist interpretation and resulted in a 44 percent reduction in screen reading workload, according to findings from a randomized controlled trial involving over 105,000 women.
