DR More Effective than CR in Breast Cancer Screening
Digital radiography (mammography) detects as many breast cancers as screen film mammography and more cancers than computed radiography.
Digital direct radiography (DR) detects more breast cancers than does computed radiography (CR), according to a study published in the journal Radiology.
Researchers from Prevention and Cancer Control at Cancer Care Ontario in Toronto, Canada, compared findings from DR, MR, and screen film mammography to assess their comparative effectiveness in breast cancer screening.
Anna M. Chiarelli, PhD, and her colleagues accessed the mammographies of 403,688 women in Ontario who had been screened between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2009. Of these women, 220,520 underwent DR and 64,210 underwent CR. The rest underwent screen film mammography. The women were followed for 12 months following their screening.
The researchers found that DR detected 4.9 cancers per 1,000 mammograms, similar to screen film mammography findings, 4.8 per 1,000. Computed radiography only detected 3.4 cancers per 1,000 mammograms.
“CR was 21 percent less effective than DR,” Chiarelli said in a release. “This could result in about 10 fewer cancers detected per 10,000 women screened.”
Technical factors could account for some of the lower detection rates, the authors wrote; DR takes an electronic image of the breast that can be stored and sent electronically, while CR is an offline system. There could be a loss of spatial resolution or sharpness, or there could be increased image noise or granularity, Chiarelli noted.
AI-Initiated Recalls After Screening Mammography Demonstrate Higher PPV for Breast Cancer
March 18th 2025While recalls initiated by one of two reviewing radiologists after screening mammography were nearly 10 percent higher than recalls initiated by an AI software, the AI-initiated recalls had an 85 percent higher positive predictive value for breast cancer, according to a new study.
ECR Mammography Study: Pre-Op CEM Detects 34 Percent More Multifocal Masses than Mammography
February 28th 2025In addition to contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) demonstrating over a 90 percent detection rate for multifocal masses, researchers found that no significant difference between histological measurements and CEM, according to study findings presented at the European Congress of Radiology.
Study: Mammography AI Leads to 29 Percent Increase in Breast Cancer Detection
February 5th 2025Use of the mammography AI software had a nearly equivalent false positive rate as unassisted radiologist interpretation and resulted in a 44 percent reduction in screen reading workload, according to findings from a randomized controlled trial involving over 105,000 women.
