Tuesday morning, after Dr. David Levin and Dr. Alan Kaye’s course on self-referral in imaging, someone was handing out a press statement as attendees walked out the door. The title, “Patients belong in the imaging picture,” is profound. I agree, and groceries belong in the grocery store. I cannot think of a single imaging study I have ever done that would have been more useful had the patient not been in the study.
Tuesday morning, after Dr. David Levin and Dr. Alan Kaye's course on self-referral in imaging, someone was handing out a press statement as attendees walked out the door. The title, "Patients belong in the imaging picture," is profound. I agree, and groceries belong in the grocery store. I cannot think of a single imaging study I have ever done that would have been more useful had the patient not been in the study.
This statement was released by the Physicians for Patient-Centered Imaging (PPCI), an alliance of 18 altruistic medical societies, academies, and colleges that feel self-referral is God's gift to man. They are, of course, the same people who for the first 20 years of my medical career cried out in self-righteous indignation every time one of my reports mentioned getting another study. Self-referral is like sex - it's naughty when other people do it.
The last paragraph of the statement is a beautiful example of how to put the needs of your patients first, while keeping your own needs just in front of theirs:
"Healthcare for our nation's Medicare beneficiaries should not be about market control but about quality, patient convenience, and continuity of care. PPCI supports patient care plans that keep the welfare of the patient paramount and defends in-office imaging as consistent with patient-centered, value-added care, providing Medicare patients with access to essential and timely imaging by their physicians."
The gloves are coming off. Turf wars are escalating to star wars.
I suspect that in some expensive resorts and spas, in climes much warmer than Chicago, some very highly compensated health insurance executives, malpractice attorneys, and healthcare entrepreneurs are having a good laugh. They are siphoning off an astronomical percentage of the healthcare dollar, and physicians are fighting like street urchins over what they leave behind. And we think we're smart.
My favorite party at the RSNA meeting every year is the Philips event at the Art Institute. (This excludes last year's Bracco event at the House of Blues featuring Dan Ackroyd and Jim Belushi as the Blues Brothers, which will never be equaled.) This year, two special exhibits were open for the evening. One was an exhibit of early - very early - American art. On display were artifacts from Ohio dating before 1000 BC. Remains of sophisticated cultures have been excavated in several areas of the Mississippi River basin, dating hundreds to thousands of years BC. I was completely ignorant. It was an amazing exhibit.
The second exhibit featured 10 architects' vision of the future Chicago. It was either over my head, or it was stupid. But there was one fascinating room. When you walked in, you were surrounded by seemingly random upright pieces of metal, all painted the same monotone gray. Near the ceiling in one corner was a TV camera focused on the room, with four monitors hanging down. From the perspective of the camera, the random pieces of metal projected as four symmetric columns in an otherwise empty room, and you were walking both among and through the columns. The reality in the room around me contradicted the reality of the real-time TV image I saw on the four monitors. Perspective is everything.
An alliance of 18 medical societies, led by the American College of Cardiology, has apparently declared war on us. I guess we have to defend ourselves. While I hate to lose any more imaging to another specialty, I wonder if we're all really fighting the right battle. Medical imaging is doing amazing things, but our environment is becoming an M.C. Escher print.
AI Facilitates Nearly 83 Percent Improvement in Turnaround Time for Fracture X-Rays
December 19th 2023In addition to offering a 98.5 percent sensitivity rate in diagnosing fractures on X-ray, an emerging artificial intelligence (AI) software reportedly helped reduce mean turnaround time on X-ray fracture diagnosis from 48 hours to 8.3 hours, according to new research presented at the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) conference.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Can an Emerging PET Radiotracer Enhance Detection of Prostate Cancer Recurrence?
December 14th 2023The use of 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI demonstrated a 35 percent higher sensitivity rate than MRI alone for the diagnosis of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer, according to research recently presented at the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) conference.
RSNA 2020: Addressing Healthcare Disparities and Access to Care
December 4th 2020Rich Heller, M.D., with Radiology Partners, and Lucy Spalluto, M.D., with Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, discuss the highlights of their RSNA 2020 session on health disparities, focusing on the underlying factors and challenges radiologists face to providing greater access to care.
Can AI Improve Detection of Extraprostatic Extension on MRI?
December 4th 2023Utilizing a deep learning-based AI algorithm to differentiate between diagnostic and non-diagnostic quality of prostate MRI facilitated a 10 percent higher specificity rate for diagnosing extraprostatic extension on multiparametric MRI, according to research presented at the recent RSNA conference.
Study: Regular Mammography Screening Reduces Breast Cancer Mortality Risk by More than 70 Percent
November 30th 2023Consistent adherence to the five most recent mammography screenings prior to a breast cancer diagnosis reduced breast cancer death risk by 72 percent in comparison to women who did not have the mammography screening, according to new research findings presented at the annual Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) conference.