One of the more pleasant things we do at the RSNA meeting every year is conduct our annual editorial advisory board breakfast. We invite all members of the advisory board (listed below) and our columnists to a hot breakfast and a discussion about what's big, new, and important in radiology.
One of the more pleasant things we do at the RSNA meeting every year is conduct our annual editorial advisory board breakfast. We invite all members of the advisory board (listed below) and our columnists to a hot breakfast and a discussion about what's big, new, and important in radiology.
The hour is always early, 7 a.m., which prompts a bit of grousing from participants, but the discussion is always stimulating and productive. It gives our staff editors, the Diagnostic Imaging sales staff, and the editorial advisors themselves an inside look at some of the thinking that drives today's practicing radiologists.
This year, I prepared a summary of the meeting and sent it out to other advisors who were not able to attend. At this writing, I'm still getting responses.
For me and the other editors, this information is golden. We talk to radiologists all the time about specific topics, but there's nothing like a freewheeling discussion to open up new concepts and ideas. It allows us to pinpoint and refine ideas that make the magazine more relevant and topical. For those who participate, either in person or via replies to my summary, it's a chance to exchange views on important trends.
Among the observations: Pay for performance is gaining traction, radiology-specific search engines are replacing textbooks among residents, and advanced visualization is playing a bigger role in interpretation. Underlying all of these trends, the pace of change in radiology is increasing.
In the months ahead, we'll be writing about those changes and discussing their implications. Stay tuned.
John C. Hayes is editor of Diagnostic Imaging
Can Generative AI Facilitate Simulated Contrast Enhancement for Prostate MRI?
January 14th 2025Deep learning synthesis of contrast-enhanced MRI from non-contrast prostate MRI sequences provided an average multiscale structural similarity index of 70 percent with actual contrast-enhanced prostate MRI in external validation testing from newly published research.
Can MRI Have an Impact with Fertility-Sparing Treatments for Endometrial and Cervical Cancers?
January 9th 2025In a literature review that includes insights from recently issued guidelines from multiple European medical societies, researchers discuss the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in facilitating appropriate patient selection for fertility-sparing treatments to address early-stage endometrial and cervical cancer.