New offerings shown at RSNA 2009 by the makers of digital mammography equipment reflected a new reality in the U.S. market, one based on cost constraints and diminishing demand. Vendors emphasized low-cost solutions that guard against obsolescence at the expense of premium ones, a change spurred by the continuing recession in the U.S. and an installed base increasingly saturated with high-end full-field digital mammography systems.
New offerings shown at RSNA 2009 by the makers of digital mammography equipment reflected a new reality in the U.S. market, one based on cost constraints and diminishing demand. Vendors emphasized low-cost solutions that guard against obsolescence at the expense of premium ones, a change spurred by the continuing recession in the U.S. and an installed base increasingly saturated with high-end full-field digital mammography systems.
In response to the current economic atmosphere, Hologic highlighted its Selenia Dimensions 2D, which, with the addition of software, can perform tomosynthesis. The software to do this is available in Europe but not the U.S., as the FDA has not yet approved the sale of products capable of breast tomo. Hologic argued in Chicago that its Dimensions 2D offers protection against obsolescence to buyers who can use the functions akin to FFDM until tomo is approved. At the same time, the company sought to attract cost-constrained buyers with its Selenia S, a lower cost FFDM unit that supports only screening but can later be upgraded to diagnostic capability.
Addressing the same cost-constrained marketplace, GE Healthcare showed on the RSNA exhibit floor its Senographe Essential e, a screening system designed for use in the doctor’s office, screening clinic, mobile unit, or hospital. Like the Selenia S, it is equipped with only the technology needed to conduct a screening exam, but can be upgraded later to support diagnosis.
Fuji Medical Systems USA remains the only provider of low-cost digital mammography in the U.S. based on computed radiography (CR). The company displayed an improved version of its CR-based product at its RSNA exhibit booth. Like its predecessor, this second-generation full-field digital mammography unit, called Aspire ClearView, scans CR plates to acquire images. Data scanned using Aspire ClearView, however, will be processed at an enhanced acquisition workstation called the AWS-c. Neither the reader nor the workstation is yet available in the U.S.
Fuji also discussed at RSNA 2009 plans to supplement its mammography portfolio with a flat-panel system. This product, which is currently pending FDA approval but is available outside the U.S. under the name Amulet, uses an amorphous selenium flat-panel detector.
Novel technology built into the detector eliminates the need for thin-film transistors, which are commonly used in other selenium-based detectors to record x-rays. The Fuji approach, called Direct Optical Switching, allows 50-micron resolution. If and when the FFDM product meets FDA approval, Fuji plans to bring it to the U.S. under the name Aspire HD.
AI-Initiated Recalls After Screening Mammography Demonstrate Higher PPV for Breast Cancer
March 18th 2025While recalls initiated by one of two reviewing radiologists after screening mammography were nearly 10 percent higher than recalls initiated by an AI software, the AI-initiated recalls had an 85 percent higher positive predictive value for breast cancer, according to a new study.
ECR Mammography Study: Pre-Op CEM Detects 34 Percent More Multifocal Masses than Mammography
February 28th 2025In addition to contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) demonstrating over a 90 percent detection rate for multifocal masses, researchers found that no significant difference between histological measurements and CEM, according to study findings presented at the European Congress of Radiology.
Study: Mammography AI Leads to 29 Percent Increase in Breast Cancer Detection
February 5th 2025Use of the mammography AI software had a nearly equivalent false positive rate as unassisted radiologist interpretation and resulted in a 44 percent reduction in screen reading workload, according to findings from a randomized controlled trial involving over 105,000 women.