Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Doses Comparable to Mammography
Radiation doses from digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to and could be lower than conventional two-view full-field digital mammography.
Radiation doses from digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to and could be lower than conventional two-view full-field digital mammography, show findings of a study published in the April issue of Radiology.
Researchers from Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, Ga., compared dose levels of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) by using compressible water-oil mixture breast phantoms of varying sizes to determine how much radiation dose would be used for varying sizes and glandular compositions of breasts.
When comparing doses with the “average” breast (compressed thickness of 5 cm, 50 percent glandular fraction), a DBT acquisition resulted in 1.30 mGy, only an 8 percent higher mean glandular dose than the FFDM acquisition of 1.20 mGy. For a thicker breast sample (6.0 cm and 14.3 percent glandular fraction), a DBT acquisition was 2.12 mGy, which was 83 percent higher than an FFDM acquisition of 1.16 mGy.
RELATED: Practices Adjust Workflow IT for Tomosynthesis Adoption
Although the thicker breast had a higher dose, the researchers pointed out that this was still lower than the 3 mGy limit for a single-view conventional study, which is set by the Mammography Quality Standards Act.
Potentially, screening DBT could reduce the recall rate, reducing the number of repeat scans, which reduces women’s overall radiation dose rate.
AI-Initiated Recalls After Screening Mammography Demonstrate Higher PPV for Breast Cancer
March 18th 2025While recalls initiated by one of two reviewing radiologists after screening mammography were nearly 10 percent higher than recalls initiated by an AI software, the AI-initiated recalls had an 85 percent higher positive predictive value for breast cancer, according to a new study.
ECR Mammography Study: Pre-Op CEM Detects 34 Percent More Multifocal Masses than Mammography
February 28th 2025In addition to contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) demonstrating over a 90 percent detection rate for multifocal masses, researchers found that no significant difference between histological measurements and CEM, according to study findings presented at the European Congress of Radiology.
Study: Mammography AI Leads to 29 Percent Increase in Breast Cancer Detection
February 5th 2025Use of the mammography AI software had a nearly equivalent false positive rate as unassisted radiologist interpretation and resulted in a 44 percent reduction in screen reading workload, according to findings from a randomized controlled trial involving over 105,000 women.
