Diagnostic Imaging's A Look Ahead: Dec. 14, 2020, to Dec. 20, 2020
Here's what to expect this week on Diagnostic Imaging.
In this week’s preview, here are some highlights of what you can expect to see coming soon on Diagnostic Imaging:
In continuing end-of-year coverage, keep an eye out for a look back at CT throughout 2020. What were the biggest developments and changes during the year. The biggest focus over the past nine months has certainly been with COVID-19, but what else happened with the modality as the pandemic raged?
For additional end-of-year coverage, click here.
For more coverage based on industry expert insights and research, subscribe to the Diagnostic Imaging e-Newsletter here.
RadXX announced their four award winners during RSNA – Trailblazer, Advocate, Rising Star, and Champion. Diagnostic Imaging spoke with each winner to find out not only what launched their interest in medical imaging informatics, but also what their visions were for the specialty going forward. Later this week, you can access a short video where they share their thoughts in their own words.
For more of the RadXX profiles, click here.
In the past 40 years, liver cancer diagnoses have tripled, and deaths have nearly doubled, making it a cancer to watch closely. Later this week, look for coverage of research that focuses on the use of ultrasound to impact liver tumors, potentially affecting overall treatment outcomes.
For additional liver cancer coverage, click here.
Can Ultrasound-Based Radiomics Enhance Differentiation of HER2 Breast Cancer?
March 11th 2025Multicenter research revealed that a combined model of clinical factors and ultrasound-based radiomics exhibited greater than a 23 percent higher per patient-level accuracy rate for identifying HER2 breast cancer than a clinical model.
ECR Mammography Study: Pre-Op CEM Detects 34 Percent More Multifocal Masses than Mammography
February 28th 2025In addition to contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) demonstrating over a 90 percent detection rate for multifocal masses, researchers found that no significant difference between histological measurements and CEM, according to study findings presented at the European Congress of Radiology.
