Diagnostic errors are the most important causes of avoidable harm to patients in hospitals, warns a senior doctor on bmj.com today.
Diagnostic errors are the most important causes of avoidable harm to patients in hospitals, warns a senior doctor on bmj.com today.
Dr. Gordon Caldwell, a consultant physician at Worthing Hospital in Western Sussex, argues that doctors need better facilities and sufficient time to make a correct diagnosis.
When a patient is admitted to hospital, the team of doctors formulate a “working diagnosis,” he said. At this point, the diagnosis is uncertain but the patient is treated as if the working diagnosis were correct.
“If over the next few days the patient gets better, the working diagnosis is confirmed and becomes the diagnosis,” he said.
But, if the patient does not improve, clinicians must consider whether the working diagnosis was wrong, according to Caldwell.
“The time taken to reach the correct diagnosis may critically impact on the patient’s chances of survival,” he said. “Over my career, I have seen many errors in the working diagnosis causing harm and even death to patients.”
Little consideration seems to have been given to how doctors make and refine the working diagnosis and treatment plan for the patient, he said.
“We must allow clinicians enough time to be careful in diagnosis, treatment planning and treatment review,” he said.
Dr. Caldwell believes that the profession has failed to let our patients and society know about this very important problem.
“We must design our working spaces and information systems to maximize doctors’ ability to see, understand, and deliberate on the information needed for more precise diagnosis,” he said. “We must allow clinicians enough time to be careful in diagnosis, treatment planning, and treatment review. We must urgently consider how to provide rooms, time, and information for doctors to do the most difficult part of their job and the part most prone to error: the clinical thinking in making the working diagnosis and treatment plan.”
Study Reaffirms Low Risk for csPCa with Biopsy Omission After Negative Prostate MRI
December 19th 2024In a new study involving nearly 600 biopsy-naïve men, researchers found that only 4 percent of those with negative prostate MRI had clinically significant prostate cancer after three years of active monitoring.
Study Examines Impact of Deep Learning on Fast MRI Protocols for Knee Pain
December 17th 2024Ten-minute and five-minute knee MRI exams with compressed sequences facilitated by deep learning offered nearly equivalent sensitivity and specificity as an 18-minute conventional MRI knee exam, according to research presented recently at the RSNA conference.
Can Radiomics Bolster Low-Dose CT Prognostic Assessment for High-Risk Lung Adenocarcinoma?
December 16th 2024A CT-based radiomic model offered over 10 percent higher specificity and positive predictive value for high-risk lung adenocarcinoma in comparison to a radiographic model, according to external validation testing in a recent study.