Manual entry of CT dose reporting makes it highly susceptible to inaccurate information.
Institutions may have difficulty complying with the mandatory CT dose reporting law in California because reporting processes rely on manual data entry and are unreliable, according to a study published in the American Journal of Roentgenology.
Researchers from the Stanford School of Medicine in California undertook a retrospective review of reports to assess radiologist compliance with this legislation, which became effective on July 1, 2013.
The researchers assessed 664 chest CT examinations performed alone and combination CT examinations of the chest along with other contiguous regions, such as the abdomen, and noncontiguous regions, such as the head, performed at their institution from July 1, 2012, to June 30, 2013. Excluded were CT examinations that did not include scanning of the chest and CT angiography studies. They were looking for errors in documentation of volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP), and phantom size.
Both CTDIvol and DLP had to be documented accurately to be considered legally compliant. Phantom size had to be accurately documented to be institutionally compliant. In addition, the researchers tracked reports that did not document dose in the standard format (phantom size, CTDIvol for each series, and total DLP).
The results showed several problems with the reporting:
Of 664 examinations, 599 (90.2%) met legal reporting requirements, and 583 (87.8%) met institutional requirements, the authors noted.
“Most reports were noncompliant owing to accuracy errors,” the authors wrote. “Even though reporting numerically accurate values would appear to be a simple task, it is ultimately prone to human error. Errors could have arisen from the radiologist's dictating values incorrectly or the transcriptionist's misunderstanding the values dictated, which were then not rechecked before report signature.”
The researchers concluded that higher-reliability processes, including better-defined standards and automated dose-reporting systems, are necessary to improve compliance.
Shaping the Future of Radiology in 2025: Trends, Threats, and Opportunities
January 10th 2025How do we respond to challenges with staff recruitment, cybersecurity, and looming hospital takeovers in radiology? This author assesses key trends in radiology and offers key insights to stay competitive in the field.
New CT and MRI Research Shows Link Between LR-M Lesions and Rapid Progression of Early-Stage HCC
January 2nd 2025Seventy percent of LR-M hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases were associated with rapid growth in comparison to 12.5 percent of LR-4 HCCs and 28.5 percent of LR-4 HCCs, according to a new study.
Can Radiomics Bolster Low-Dose CT Prognostic Assessment for High-Risk Lung Adenocarcinoma?
December 16th 2024A CT-based radiomic model offered over 10 percent higher specificity and positive predictive value for high-risk lung adenocarcinoma in comparison to a radiographic model, according to external validation testing in a recent study.