An Italian investigation suggests virtual colonography is a better follow-up test for failed colonoscopy than a double-contrast barium enema.
An Italian investigation suggests virtual colonography is a better follow-up test for failed colonoscopy than a double-contrast barium enema.
Dr. Lapo Sali of the radiodiagnostic section within the department of clinical physiopathology at the University of Florence and colleagues conducted a population-based screening program for colorectal cancer in Tuscany (World J Gastroenterol 2008;14[28]:4499-4504).
During the one-year screening process, 43,290 individuals underwent a fecal occult blood test. About 4.3%, or 1882 subjects, were positive. Of those patients, 77.7%, or 1463 patients, underwent colonoscopy. The rest refused.
Sali and colleagues found 7.2%, or 65, of the colonoscopies were incomplete, and 42 of these subjects then underwent CTC, which correctly identified two colonic masses and 20 polyps.
The data suggest CTC should be the “go to” method after a colonoscopy fails, especially since the process is easier than a double-contrast barium enema.
Other researchers have conducted studies on CTC after incomplete colonoscopy, but the studies included asymptomatic as well as symptomatic subjects, according to Sali and colleagues.
The results for medium-sized polyps (6 to 9 mm), with a per-lesion positive predictive value of 77.8%, might be due to thinner collimation for CT scanning and double reading of the examinations, the researchers said.
In addition to failed colonoscopies, the researchers noticed a high number of false-positive results, which led to unnecessary repeat colonoscopy. They suggest fecal tagging to reduce the number of false positives.
Sali’s study is nothing earth-shattering, according to Dr. Judy Yee, vice chair of radiology and biomedical imaging at the University of California, San Francisco, but it confirms the American Cancer Society’s and American College of Radiology’s recommendations from May that CTC is useful for colon cancer screening.
“CTC has a couple of advantages over a barium enema,” Yee said. “It’s easier on the patient, and you can view a portion of the colon not seen on barium enema.”
Barium is a thick liquid, difficult to administer, and it often won’t coat the colon adequately, Yee said.
“Additionally, CTC is shown to be more accurate for identifying polyps,” she said.
For more information from the Diagnostic Imaging archives:
CT colonography’s proven clinical worth now invites reimbursement
Available scanners tackle future CTC screening demand
Radiology societies seek Medicare coverage for CT colonography
GE HealthCare Debuts AI-Powered Cardiac CT Device at ACC Conference
April 1st 2025Featuring enhanced low-dose image quality with motion-free images, the Revolution Vibe CT system reportedly facilitates improved diagnostic clarity for patients with conditions ranging from in-stent restenosis to atrial fibrillation.
Predicting Diabetes on CT Scans: What New Research Reveals with Pancreatic Imaging Biomarkers
March 25th 2025Attenuation-based biomarkers on computed tomography (CT) scans demonstrated a 93 percent interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) agreement across three pancreatic segmentation algorithms for predicting diabetes, according to a study involving over 9,700 patients.
Can Photon-Counting CT be an Alternative to MRI for Assessing Liver Fat Fraction?
March 21st 2025Photon-counting CT fat fraction evaluation offered a maximum sensitivity of 81 percent for detecting steatosis and had a 91 percent ICC agreement with MRI proton density fat fraction assessment, according to new prospective research.