The news was mixed for CT in the emergency department in research presented Wednesday at the RSNA meeting. CT was found to be better than ultrasound for diagnosing ER patients with abdominal pain, but radiation dose can be drastically reduced for patients suspected of appendicitis, according to authors of several studies.
The news was mixed for CT in the emergency department in research presented Wednesday at the RSNA meeting. CT was found to be better than ultrasound for diagnosing ER patients with abdominal pain, but radiation dose can be drastically reduced for patients suspected of appendicitis, according to authors of several studies.
In a study comparing CT and ultrasound for diagnosing acute abdominal pain, CT scans provided greater sensitivity but more false-positive urgent diagnoses while ultrasound had more false negatives in 1021 patients who presented in the ER with acute abdominal pain and suspected appendicitis. Based on the findings, the investigators consider CT the modality of choice for detecting urgent disease, although the urgency may be overestimated.
In a related study, researchers used the same patient base to develop a decision model for use of CT. They analyzed three scenarios for use of CT, based on clinical predictors, and found that selective CT use could lower the negative appendectomy rate and improve its efficiency.
CT is not used for all patients with suspected appendicitis and a negative appendectomy rate ranging from 12% to 16% is reported.
In another study of 131 patients with suspected appendicitis, researchers compared standard and (simulated) low dose, with and without oral /and or intravenous contrast.
Results showed that the protocol had little effect on diagnosis, leading to the conclusion that radiation dose should be reduced to 30 mAs from 100 mAs in this situation. Results also showed that when contrast material was used, fewer signs were misclassified, and appendix visualization and the readers' confidence in their diagnosis were higher.
Can Radiomics Bolster Low-Dose CT Prognostic Assessment for High-Risk Lung Adenocarcinoma?
December 16th 2024A CT-based radiomic model offered over 10 percent higher specificity and positive predictive value for high-risk lung adenocarcinoma in comparison to a radiographic model, according to external validation testing in a recent study.
Study Shows Merits of CTA-Derived Quantitative Flow Ratio in Predicting MACE
December 11th 2024For patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), researchers found that those with a normal CTA-derived quantitative flow ratio (CT-QFR) had a 22 percent higher MACE-free survival rate.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.