Studies presented in the first half of 2007 added power to the argument favoring coronary CT angiography to cut some of the $10 billion spent annually to diagnose patients who arrive in the emergency room with chest pain.
Studies presented in the first half of 2007 added power to the argument favoring coronary CT angiography to cut some of the $10 billion spent annually to diagnose patients who arrive in the emergency room with chest pain.
Dr. Gudrun Feuchtner and colleagues at Medical University Innsbruck in Austria found coronary CTA to be a cost-effective pretest to exclude stenosis > 50% in intermediate risk patients with clinically suspected coronary artery disease. Their analysis showed the use of CTA rather than catheter angiography in 22 patients saved more than $20,000.
Dr. James A. Goldstein at William Beaumont Hospital in Michigan conducted the first prospective randomized trial demonstrating coronary CTA's value in the acute chest pain setting (J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:863-871). He randomized 99 patients to CTA and 98 to standard of care.
Cardiac CT either excluded or identified coronary artery disease as the cause of acute chest pain in 75% of patients, including 67 with normal coronary arteries and eight with severe disease referred for invasive evaluation. The remaining 25% required additional testing because of intermediate severity lesions or nondiagnostic scans. Diagnostic time and costs using CT were reduced to a mean 3.4 hours and $1582 versus 15 hours and $1872 for standard of care.
Can MRI-Based AI Enhance Risk Stratification in Prostate Cancer?
January 13th 2025Employing baseline MRI and clinical data, an emerging deep learning model was 32 percent more likely to predict the progression of low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) to clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), according to new research.
Shaping the Future of Radiology in 2025: Trends, Threats, and Opportunities
January 10th 2025How do we respond to challenges with staff recruitment, cybersecurity, and looming hospital takeovers in radiology? This author assesses key trends in radiology and offers key insights to stay competitive in the field.
Can MRI Have an Impact with Fertility-Sparing Treatments for Endometrial and Cervical Cancers?
January 9th 2025In a literature review that includes insights from recently issued guidelines from multiple European medical societies, researchers discuss the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in facilitating appropriate patient selection for fertility-sparing treatments to address early-stage endometrial and cervical cancer.